Archive for May, 2009

I hope your church has not demoted preaching for a more popular and entertaining method. I just read a forum on preaching in The Journal of the Evangelical Homiletics Society by Hughes Oliphant Old. Old has an excellent seven history of preaching called The Reading and Preaching of the Scriptures in the Worship of the Christian [...]

Do you have any hobbies?” I am sometimes asked. “Sure, I have hobbies, everybody has hobbies” I quickly answer. “Oh, what are your hobbies?” “Uh, well, let me get back with you on that.”  My hobbies have centered around my family and church. I’ve read thousands of books to my boys, if you count all the [...]

There are two conflicting methods of interpreting Scripture: The literal and the allegorical method. The literal or grammatical-historical method is the method Roy Zuck is teaching in the book of our review “Basic Bible Interpretation.” This method interprets Scripture in the normal sense of language. The way you read the  daily news on cnn.com or foxnews.com. [...]

In addition to telling us why and how to blog, The Blogging Church interviews blogging pastors or leaders. There are 5 questions in each interview. The first blogging pastor interviewed was Mark Driscoll. Driscoll’s blog is www.theresurgence.com/blog and his church’s blog is www.marshillchurch.org. First Question:  After a short bio, Driscoll is asked “What pushed you over [...]

Start early! This is the welcomed advice of Bruce Mawhinney in Preaching with Freshness, Eugene: Harvest House Publishers, 1991, p. 41). “Early exegesis helps to prevent late eisegesis.” Bruce Mawhinney is senior pastor of New Covenant Fellowship in Mechanicsburg and writes one of the most refreshing books on preaching I have ever read. Preaching with [...]

Roy Zuck begins chapter one “The What and Why of Bible Interpretation” with the Ethiopian eunuch responding to Philip’s hermeneutic question, “Do you understand what you are reading?” The eunuch’s response, “How can I…unless some man explain it to me” (Acts 8:31)? Zuck ends the chapter with the doctrine of clarity or perspicuity which teaches [...]

In this final post, Toussaint addresses other issues in preterism. The preterists say that “all these things” in Matthew 24:29 “refer to the non-bodily, non-personal coming of Christ through the Roman army in the first century” (The End Time Controversy, page 94). Toussaint in a journal article disagrees: “The word ['coming' Gk. parousia] in the New Testament [...]

Brian Bailey and Terry Storch answer the question, “Should my church become a blogging church?” Before Bailey and Storch tell us how to blog they want us to answer “Why?” Actually there are three questions to answer before your church adds this technology to your ministry. IS IT A TOOL OR A TOY? Technology is [...]

In this video, Sproul begins to lay his preterist interpretation of the Olivet Discourse by stating that the events predicted by Jesus were fulfilled in A. D. 70. Stanley D. Toussaint discusses the four major views of the Olivet Discourse. The first view is called the critical interpretation. This view does not even believe that [...]

  Thomas Ice identifies several important partial preterists. Within Covenant theology men like Jay Adams and J. Marcellus Kik are partial preterists. Ice also identifies Greg L. Bahnsen, who is a Reformed and Reconstructionist preterist who was influential in producing other preterists like David Chilton, Gary DeMar, and Kenneth Gentry. Ice makes note that the [...]