The following is an impressive array of theologians who believe the Scriptures teach an effective, effectual call or efficacious grace.
Lewis Sperry Chafer
Since it is clearly indicated that one hundred percent of those predestinated are called, and one hundred percent of those called are justified, and one hundred percent of those justified are glorified (Rom. 8:30). . . .Likewise, there is a general call which may be felt whenever the gospel is preached, and it, too, may be resisted as it often is; but over against this is the efficacious call of Romans 8:30. In this passage, as before observed, it is assured that everyone whom God predestinates is called, and the precise numerical company, again, of those called are justified, and that same company—no more and no less—are to be glorified (Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, vol. III Soteriology, Dallas: Dallas Seminary Press, pages 211 and 216).
This divine call which results in salvation is called efficacious grace because it is certainly effectual in revealing the gospel and in leading to saving faith.
John Walvoord
In contrast to this work of God is the general call to salvation given to all who hear the gospel. In this sense, Christ said, “I come not to call the righteous, but sinners” (Matt. 9:13). The call to repentance and faith was not always heeded, as demonstrated by the fact that Christ also said, “For many are called, but few chosen” (Matt. 22:14). An examination of the many references to calling in the New Testament will reveal, however, that in most instances they refer to the efficacious call. Efficacious grace, then, stands in contrast to common grace as the effectual call stands in contrast to the general call.
For practical purposes, the grace provided is involved in the call given, and divine calling and the grace which is inherent in it are the same subject (John Walvoord, The Holy Spirit, Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 1991, p.120).
Dwight Pentecost
The word “predestination” is logically followed by the word “called,” which is to be understood in its normal designation in which God calls whom He has foreknown, those whom He has elected, those whom He has predestinated, unto Himself. The call of God to the elect of God—who have been predestinated unto glory—is the consummating act of God’s foreordination. God sees to it that His purpose will be accomplished. Those whom He has chosen for Himself will be brought to Himself, that His foreknown and predetermined program might be brought to consummation. The Apostle, in Roman 8:30, said, “Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called; and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.” The call, then, is a summons to Himself, because they have been predestined unto glory by His foreordained purpose and program.
God’s call is not a call to the human will, asking the human will unaided by divine grace, to respond. God’s call is also God’s enablement; and God, who issues the call, imparts the power through the ministry of the Holy Spirit to respond to that call, so that the sinner who is dead, who is without life, who is under condemnation and judgment, may hear God’s call; and although he has no power in himself because he is dead, and no desire to respond because God has been put out of his life, he is enabled by the Holy Spirit to respond to the gracious invitation (Dwight Pentecost, Things Which Become Sound Doctrine, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1965, pages 141, 142).
Charles Ryrie
Efficacious grace is the work of the Holy Spirit which effectively moves men to believe in Jesus Christ as Savior. It is the work of the Spirit which moves men to believe; therefore, it may be said that no man is saved against his will (Ryrie, The Holy Spirit, p. 61).
Robert Lightner
Salvation becomes a reality when, at the moment of faith, the Holy Spirit imparts life to the believing sinner. When the Holy Spirit moves in this way upon the individual, His ministry is always 100 percent effective (note Rom. 8:28-30 that those called are glorified). This work of the Spirit in moving sinners to trust in Christ, the sin bearer, has been called efficacious grace, or effectual grace (Robert Lightner. Sin, The Savior, and Salvation, Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, p. 154).
Hoyle Bowman
Such a position obviously separates the work of Christ on the cross from the Holy Spirit’s application of that work to the sinner. As has been stated the cross does not secure its own results. The effect must be prompted by another cause which is the efficacious work of the Holy Spirit issuing in saving faith (Hoyle Bowman, A Case for Unlimited Atonement, Winston/Salem: Piedmont Baptist College, p. 6).
Robert Gromacki
This general call is an expression of divine grace. It alone does not save nor does it always lead to salvation. Man must respond to this call. Paul wrote, “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Ro 10:13). However, not every man answers God’s general call by calling upon Him. Many are called, but few are chosen. The chosen are those who are the objects of God’s effectual call. They are the called ones according to God’s eternal purpose (Ro 8:28). It is God’s direct will that these called receive all that is involved in God’s gift of salvation. Note Paul’s words, “Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified” (Ro 8:30). These called have already (according to God’s sovereign decree) been foreknown and predestinated. Their justification and glorification are just as certain as their calling (Robert Glenn Gromacki, Salvation is Forever, Chicago: Moody Press, 1973, pages 39, 40).
Millard J. Erickson
Special calling is in large measure the Holy Spirit’s work of illumination, enabling the recipient to understand the true meaning of the gospel. This working is necessary because of the depravity which is characteristic of all humans prevents them from grasping God’s revealed truth. Commenting on 1 Corinthians 2:6-16, George Ladd remarks that “only by the illumination of the Spirit can men understand the meaning of the cross; only by the Spirit can men therefore confess that Jesus who was executed is also Lord (1 Cor.12:3)” (Millard J. Erickson. Christian Theology, Vol. 3. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1985, 931).
Wayne Grudem
We may define effective calling as follows: Effective calling is an act of God the Father, speaking through the human proclamation of the gospel, in which he summons peope to himself in such a way that they respond in saving faith. It is important that we not give the impression that people will be saved by the power of this call apart from their own willing response to the gospel. Although it is true that effective calling awakens and brings forth a response from us, we must always insist that this response still has to be a voluntry, willing response in which the indivdual person puts his or her trust in Christ” (Wayne Grudem. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994, 692-693).
From this list we see that both dispenstationalists and reformed theologians believe in the effective call. But there is usually a difference in the relationship between the effective call and regeneration. Reformed theologians believe that regeneration precedes the effective call and saving faith. For example, Wayne Grudem writes, “Scripture indicates that regeneration must come before we can respond to effective calling with saving faith” (page 700).
I agree with Millard J. Erickson who wrote that, “The logical order is calling, conversion, regeneration….The special calling is simply an intensive and effective working of the Holy Spirit. It is not the complete transformation which constitutes regeneration, but it does render the conversion of the individual both possible and certain. Thus the logical order of the initial aspects of salvation is special calling—conversion—regeneration” (pages 932-933).
This is where I disagree with Piper’s sermon: The Free Will of the Wind: “So what verse 8 is teaching is this: We don’t cause the Spirit to bring about the new birth any more than we make the wind blow. Or to be more specific, the decisive act of will in the new birth is not ours. The Spirit’s will is decisive. To be sure, our will moves in the moment of the new birth. Change happens in us. There are perceptible effects of the wind—“ you hear its sound.”
Even Grudem admits “that two passages suggest that God regenerates us at the same time as he speaks to us in effective calling:1 Peter 1:23 ‘since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God.’ And James says, ‘He chose to give us birth through the word of truth’ (James 1:18 NIV)” (Grudem, 700).

How can regeneration come before we respond to the calling? Look at the interaction between Jesus and the Samaritan woman. Quoting Ryrie in Basic Theology, “He (meaning Jesus) simply said she needed to knpw who He is and to ask for the gift of eternal life. In a physical illustration wouldn’t Grudem’s comment be like expecting a child to take a bath and get clean but withholding the soap and water? Regeneration is defined by Ryrie as being born again. For Grudem’s comment to be true wouldn’t we have to be born again before we receive the Holy Spirit? Don’t we have to recognize we need to be born again?
What about conviction, where does that fit?
Charles,
You ask a good question. What Grudem and others call the regeneration of the Holy Spirit, the Scriptures identifies as conviction that is necessary for salvation and produces regeneration when the convicted sinner believes.
I completely agree with Ryrie. It is only the work of the Holy Spirit that moves people to accept the Gospel as truth and accept Christ! The Holy Spirit does not make them accept it otherwise this would not be free will. I also like what Pentecost says about the call of God. We as humans have no power in ourselves because we are dead, and have no desire to hear the call of God, but the Holy Spirit gives us the power to hear and respond, ( with our own free will).
For starters, I love how Gromacki points this doctrine back to the grace we have to know it. “This general call is an expression of divine grace”. Makes me think and realize that it is by the grace of God that we even have this ability to sit and talk through these doctrines. Anyways, my biggest area of unease with this argument is the question, “How can we believe in something, and give our live over to something so good and pure, without our hearts being made new to appreciate and seek after that being?” Regeneration before faith seems to always pop up in any conversation about faith, and honestly I always dread it. I also agree with Grudem in saying that the acts within salvation all occur at the same time. We are all called, regenerated, and given faith. I really wish this was plainly answered in the Bible, as with most doctrines.
Caitlin, I also appreciated Gromacki on this subject.
Wow, Robert Gromacki was my mothers professor when she went to Cedarville College when they were a new college. Anyhow, there is no regeneration if there is no calling. So logically a “calling” must come first! The efficacious calling of the Holy Spirit comes before the conversion because it is the substance of the conversion… if we weren’t efficaciously called then we would continue in our blind and dead ways of sin. So, it is natural then to state that first there is a efficacious calling by the grace of God, then a conversion within the person, which leads to regeneration of the person and it all is seen to be the work of the Holy Spirit… except the actual will faith which the person places in Christ… However that faith is in itself a gift from God.
I think that the idea of regeneration before salvation is crazy! I mean think about it. conviction simply wouldn’t fit since the regeneration has already happened. salvation is by faith and is a gift. Eph 2:8-9. We have to accept it before regeneration occurs.
This whole thing that the Holy Spirit is the one who does the act of saving us and not the choice of the individual does not make sense. Since God gave every man free will, that free will is to either accept His calling or not. In the first post it was put that in the conversion of Saul to Paul it was the God who made the choice for Him, but it was not Saul/Paul made the choice to follow Christ and to repent of His sin.
The effectual call leads to salvation while the general call only leads to conviction. All men experience the general call, but not all experience the effectual call since not all men will be saved. I liked Wayne Grudem’s words the best, “It is important that we not give the impression that people will be saved by the power of this call apart from their own willing response to the gospel.” He insists the decision for salvation is voluntary on the part of the individual. Even though God’s call is compelling, the choice for salvation is ultimately up to the individual.
What is amazing to me after reading through the variety of excerts provided by Dr. White is the fine lines that are drawn and arrangement of the spiritual work of efficacious grace by various theologians. While I find the arguments somewhat tedious, it is more apparent of the need to know what the Scriptures say and how to defend what we believe. I suppose it beyond my understanding to understand why some would believe in regeneration before the effective call and saving faith. To me, and I believe the Scriptures, regeneration is work brought about by saving grace. Paul says that we were formerly an old man but have brought to a newness of a new man through, first, faith.
I need a little help here. When we say that a person is saved by the efficacious call of the Holy Spirit, are we saying that the person is saved because the Spirit gave them the efficacious call, or is the call “efficacious” because it resulted in salvation? The latter explanation would make sense to me; however, if it is the former, wouldn’t that mean that, since not everyone receives this efficacious call, that it is the same as God choosing to save some and not others? It almost sounds like not everyone has the same opportunity to be saved, and I don’t believe that’s true, even of the remotest tribes. Dayuma of the Auca indians in Ecuador couldn’t help but think that there had to be more to life than spearing to become strong enough to jump the Great Boa and reach the afterlife. She asked the God that is (the one she didn’t know intimately) to show her truth, and the LORD sent Rachel Saint and Elizabeth Elliott. Also, if the efficacious call is that supernatural call that always results in a salvation, wouldn’t it be saying the same thing that John Piper is saying, that God can overcome our resistance whenever He wants, and in all reality, removes choice from the equation? If my understanding of this aspect of salvation is correct, just tell me I’m correct. However, if I’m misunderstanding this, I would greatly welcome anyone straightening me out, and multiple replies are invited. Thanks.
“The effect must be prompted by another cause which is the efficacious work of the Holy Spirit issuing in saving faith.” dr. Bowman Jesus’ death was not passive! It was active! the second that He died on that cross he took away my sins! The holy spirit is necessary for sure! but Christ chose to take away my sins when He said “it is finished!”
I really enjoyed this post! So many quotes from so many amazingly great theologians. There is alot of wisdom here. The effectual call of God became a little more clearer to me by reading these quotes, but I still struggle with the oposite side, the general call, I know we are not to question God, and I fully trust that His ways are better than mine. Yet, I wonder if the casual, ineffective, or general call of God goes against His character. Any new doctrine that appears that goes against what we know of God’s character is hard to understand, and hard to accept. If God is love and good how do we explain the ineffective call?
I feel that Ryrie summed the subject of efficacious grace well when he wrote, “Efficacious grace is the work of the Holy Spirit which effectively moves men to believe in Jesus Christ as Savior.” This is the simplest definition, and still holds the meaning of the subject.
The word efficacious is defined as “having the power to produce the intended effect,” or simply stated, effective. Therefore, efficacious grace is effective grace – grace that has the power to produce the intended effect. When applied to salvation, efficacious grace is all that God does for people when they put their faith in Christ that produces the intended result of deliverance (salvation). This is called saving grace because it saves the unbeliever from the condemnation of spiritual death (separation from God) and places that person, who is now a believer, in a permanent relationship with God. This permanent relationship sets up great potential for blessing from God, all of which is based upon His grace. John 3:18; Romans 8:1