The Importance of Doctrinal Statements: Part 4 “The Baptist Distinctives”

Posted: April 19, 2010 in Doctrinal Statements, Pastoral Theology
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

spurgeonThe late Dr. Colon Smith, in a Baptist Bulletin article, thought the acrostic B-A-P-T-I-S-T is harmful in teaching the Baptist distinctives rather than helpful. For example, Dr. Smith asks, “Where is the “C” for congregational rule in the acrostic?” Dr. Smith tells of a church that changed its form of government from congregational to elder rule. The pastor sent a challenging letter to the state association, saying congregational church government is unbiblical. This pastor further claimed that our fellowship must not believe in congregational government because there’s no “C” in the B-A-P-T-I-S-T acrostic. Apparently someone actually took the B-A-P-T-I-S-T acrostic as the official definition of the Baptist distinctive, and not simply a handy, artificial memory device!

The Baptist Distinctives should aid us in understanding the doctrine of the church with a logical progression. There is no logical progressive from

Biblical Authority to the

Autonomy of the local church to the

Priesthood of every believer to

Two Officers to

Individual Soul Liberty to

Separation of Church and State to

Two Ordinances and then by adding another “S” to

Saved Church Membership

1. Biblical Authority

A. Biblical Authority is not the same as believing the inspiration of Scripture because the RCC also holds to this doctrine. But the RCC does not believe that the Bible is the supreme authority for faith and practice. For RCC the traditions of church have greater authority than Scripture. For example, the doctrine of purgatory is not found in Scripture but still adhered to in the tradition of the RCC.

B. The Bible is the supreme authority for faith and practice not the sole authority. There are other authorities such as parents, government, that God has ordained in His Word. These only have authority, however, because the Word of God has invested them with authority. God’s Word is the supreme authority.

2. Saved or Regenerate Church Membership

A. It is the Word of God that regenerates (1 Peter 1:23).

B. If there is no regenerate church membership there is no Biblical authority (1 Cor 2:9-14). It is impossible to get unsaved people to love God, His Word, His people (Rom 8:1-4). Therefore a regenerate church membership flows out of Biblical Authority.

3. Priesthood of the Believer

A. Every believer has access to God because of regeneration (Rom 5:1-2).

B. Every believer is a Believer Priest through whom God works (1 Pet 2:5, 9).

C. Every believer is a Believer Priest with no human high priest which calls for congregational rule (Matthew 18:15-17; 1 Corinthians 5).

D. Every believer is taught of God (1 John 2:27).

E. Every believer offers the sacrifices of praise (Heb 13:15) purse (Heb 13:16) and person (Rom 12:1-2). The Priesthood of the believers is based on Biblical authority and a regenerate church membership which results in congregational rule.

4. Congregational Rule

A.  In Acts 1:26, before Pentecost officers were chosen by lot. That was the Jewish way.

B.  In Acts 6, after Pentecost (when every believer is a believer priest) officers were chosen by the congregation. Congregational rule is seen in Matthew 18:15-19, when Jesus prescribed church discipline only when the unrepentent offender is treated as a heathen by a church decision. The final court of appeal is the congregation not elders or a Bishop.

5. Two Officers

A. Pastor: 1Tim 3:1-7 Elected by the congregational rule. This position is synonymous with elder and bishop. Because the three terms are used interchangebly in Scripture (Acts 20:17-28) there is not a third office of Bishop that eventually developed in church history.

B. Deacons: 1Tim 3:8-12 Elected by the congregational rule as seen in Acts 6:1-7.

6. Two Ordinances

A. Baptism demonstrates regenerated membership and union with Christ. As F. F. Bruce said in his commentary on the book of Acts that there are no unbaptized believers in the book of Acts. We are first Spirit baptized into and identified with the Universal Church (1 Cor 12:13) and then water baptized into and identified with a local church.

B. Lord’s Supper demonstrates regenerated membership and communion with Christ and His Church (1 Cor 10:16).

7. Individual Soul Liberty

A. We have individual soul liberty because of the priesthood of every believer.

B. Soul liberty is the truth that every believer answers only to God and his or her conscience (Acts 5:29).

C. Government does not force us to believe or practice what we believe against our conscience therefore we also believe another Baptist Distinctive: Separation of church and state (Matthew 22:21). You cannot have the autonomy of the local church (another Baptist Distinctive) without separation of church and state and you must have separation of church and state because of soul liberty.

D. This is another reason we do not practice infant baptism because infant baptism violates individual soul liberty (Acts 16:31-34). The church is forcing its identity on the infant without consent. I agree with the late Dr. Colon Smith that this is the way to teach the Baptist Distincitives rather than the artiflical acrostic.

There are 32 references to doctrine, teaching, teachers and teach in the Pastoral Epistles emphasizing the necessity of knowing doctrine. In 1 Timothy 1, Paul lays out the three fold purpose of the church:

1. Teach Doctrine (1:1-11)

2. Win the Lost (1:12-17)

3. Defend the Truth (1:18-20)

A clear doctrinal statement can help us accomplish these three practical goals. All four posts on The Importance of Doctrinal Statements are under Category “Doctrinal Statements.”

About these ads
Comments
  1. I agree with one exception. Two offices cannot be a baptist distinctive because not all baptists observe that. I know it makes it neat to use the B.A.P.T.I.S.T.S. Rather I thing the acronym B.R.A.P.S.I.S²

    Bible is the only rule for faith and practice
    Redeemed church membership
    Autonomy of the local church
    Priesthood of the believer
    Soul liberty
    Immersion baptism and the Lord’s supper only two ordinances
    Separation of Church and state.

  2. Aaron Eaton says:

    Enjoyed reading this. I remember having to learn about this in Baptist History class. I took that class a while ago so this was a nice reminder of some of the things I learned. And to Jacob, can we truly consider a church “Baptist” even if they are labeled “Baptist” if they do not observe the 2 offices distinct? I am just curious.

  3. [...] You can read about important doctrinal statements in Part 1, Part 2, Part 4. [...]

  4. Hunter Childress says:

    I do not think every church that has “baptist” in its name can truly be considered a baptist church. I think that is misguided as believing that every one that calls themselves a Christian is a born-again believer. A church should not be judged by its title, but the doctrine that it holds to.

  5. deckern says:

    Thanks Dr. white for the information and defense of the baptistic doctrines. When I read this post, my mind went back to our textbook by Jackson, and his arguments for why we should have doctrinal statements and his comments on why we believe what we believe. We believe baptistic doctrines because we don’t believe baptists are right, but because we believe Scripture says it.

  6. Charles Logan Shoaf says:

    I think I agree with Jacob’s comment the most here. “Redeemed church membership” is really a better phrasing than “saved church membership.” However, individual soul liberty needs a place in the acronym. Without it, one could argue that one is “born into” the baptist church similarly to how a church with infant baptism believes.

  7. Paul Baker says:

    So many people attend Baptist churches across this nation of ours and don’t have a clue as to why they call themselves Baptist outside the area of Baptism. I believe these distinctives should be taught to our congregations so they are more informed as to why they call themselves Baptist!

  8. Elijah Moore says:

    Here we go here we go here we go again.

    I agree with you! … Just take out #4…

    I also prefer the Brapsis, but not because of the two offices (Which I would say there are two) but because it has autonomy of the local church. Yeah, having the Bible as the only authority kind of goes with that, but ultimately I think local autonomy is much more important to state than “Congregational rule”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s