Albert Mohler started a firestorm at the Ligonier Ministries 2010 National Conference when he lectured on “Why Does the Universe Look So Old?” Mohler connected the proponents of Theistic evolution and other old earth advocates with the denial of Biblical inerrancy among some evangelicals. Mohler identified some of these bedfellows at BioLogos Foundation. Among those mentioned [...]
Archive for the ‘Creation’ Category
Albert Mohler Names BioLogos Foundation as Deniers of Inerrancy
Posted: July 19, 2010 in CreationTags: Albert Mohler, Albert Mohler's "Why Does the Universe Look So Old?", BioLogos Foundation, Bruce Waltke, Darrell Falk, Karl Giberson, Ligonier Ministries 2010 National Conference, Peter Enns
21
Science Verses Christianity, Part Last
Posted: September 11, 2009 in CreationTags: Answers in Genesis, Augustus H. Strong, Gleason Archer, Ken Ham, Millard Erickson, Tim Keller, Wayne Grudem
Tim Keller rejects the view of Richard Dawkins who “argues that you cannot be an intelligent scientific thinker and still hold religious beliefs.” But Keller believes the view of a six twenty-four-hour day creation is “fortunately…losing credibility with a growing number of scholars.” In both Dawkins’ and Keller’s view, science has undermined the interpretation of Scripture. [...]
Science Verses Christianity, Part Next
Posted: September 9, 2009 in CreationTags: Charles Darwin, Derek Kidner, Erwin W. Lutzer, Eternality of Matter, Millard Erickson, Spontaneous Generation, Tim Keller, Wayne Grudem
The first tenet of evolution that we discussed was the Eternality of Matter. Next, we will discuss Spontaneous Generation which states that the first life, the first cell sprung from non-life. Darwin in 1871 wrote in a letter advancing the idea of spontaneous generation. “We could conceive in some warm little pond, with all sorts [...]
Science Verses Christianity, Part First
Posted: September 7, 2009 in CreationTags: Charles Darwin, Christianity, Eternality of Matter, evolution, Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, science, Wayne Grudem
The origin of life is the issue we are wrestling with this week. Psalm 33:6 and 9 make a very clear statement about the origin of life for those of us who believe the Bible to be the Word of God: “By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host [...]
The New Atheism, Part One
Posted: March 15, 2009 in Atheism, CreationTags: Alister McGrath, Charles Darwin, Daniel Dennett, Erwin Lutzer, Eternality of Matter, evolution, Fox News, Ken Ham, Mutations, Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Progressive Creationists, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Spontaneous Generation, The American Humanist Association, The God Delusion, The New Atheism, Theism, Theistic Evolution, Wayne Grudem
According to an article in Wired the New Atheism differs from the old atheism in mode and mood. New atheism is more aggressive in attacking Christianity. The leaders of New Atheism are Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Daniel Dennett and with evangelistic fervor, the new atheists not only reject theism but have gone on the [...]
Is the Earth “Young” or “Old?”
Posted: January 17, 2009 in "Reader's Favorites", CreationTags: "Young Earth" "Old Earth" Henry Morris, Creation, Davis A. Young, evangelicals, God, Hermeneutics, Praise, science, Systematic Theology, Wayne Grudem
THERE is a debate today among evangelicals concerning the age of earth. One view is more sympathetic to scientific evidence than the other. I think the reason for different conclusions about the age of the earth, is the inclusion of the so-called evidence from science into the hermeneutics of Genesis one and two. Both “Old [...]
Review of Chapter Six “Science Has Disproved Christianity” in The Reason For God.
Posted: January 10, 2009 in Book Reviews, CreationTags: A. H. Strong, Answers in Genesis, Atheism, Copernicus, creationism, evolution, Galileo, Gleason Archer, Ken Ham, Millard Erickson, Richard Dawkins, science, Tim Keller, Wayne Grudem
Tim Keller rejects the view of Richard Dawkins who “argues that you cannot be an intelligent scientific thinker and still hold religious beliefs.” But Keller believes the view of a six twenty-four-hour day creation is “fortunately…losing credibility with a growing number of scholars.” In both Dawkins’ and Keller’s view, science has undermined the interpretation of Scripture. [...]
