Archive for the ‘Hermeneutics/Interpretation’ Category

Why are some denominations ordaining women as pastors and deacons? Because of an evangelical feminist hermeneutic. We continue our review of Paul W. Felix’s discussion of  seven principles of evangelical feminist hermeneutics which contradict evangelical grammatical-historical hermeneutics. The first two are covered in the first post.  1. The Principle of Ad Hoc Documents 2. The Principle [...]

The hermeneutics of evangelical feminist stands in direct contrast to evangelical grammatical-historical hermeneutics. Paul W. Felix Sr. highlights these radical differences in chapter 13 in Robert Thomas’ Evangelical Hermeneutics: The New Verses the Old. Felix defines an evangelical feminist as “one who has a high view of Scripture and believes the Bible teaches the full [...]

The Washington Post reported on March1, 2005 that “The Supreme Court abolished capital punishment for juvenile offenders yesterday, ruling 5 to 4 that it is unconstitutional to sentence anyone to death for a crime he or she committed while younger than 18.” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion. The case that provoked this ruling concerned almost [...]

The New Testament uses the Old Testament prophecies in one of four ways. We will discuss these four New Testament categories into which all Old Testament prophecies are used. Three of the four involve what Robert Thomas calls Inspired Sensus Plenary Application (ISPA) without violating the original and single interpretation of the Old Testament prophecies. [...]

There is a Biblical and Unbiblical sensus plenior. We will begin with the unbiblical sensus plenior. The interpretation principle of “one interpretation, many applications” is an integral ingredient of classic hermeneutics. In contrast to this principle is sensus plenior or fuller or multiple meanings of a Biblical text. As we observed in our last post, [...]

Roy Zuck discusses the single meaning of a text and sensus plenior or fuller meaning of a text of Scripture. Zuck begins his discussion by asking, “Do the Scriptures have single meanings or multiple meanings?” (Basic Bible Interpretation, page 273).  He follows this question with the four views. 1. The first view, held by Walter Kaiser, [...]

Robert Thomas discusses and documents the following current evangelicals who have abandoned the classic interpretation principle of the single meaning of Scripture advocated by men like Milton S. Terry and Bernard Ramm: Clark Pinnock, Greg Beale, Grant Osborne, William Klein, Craig Blomberg, Robert Hubbard, Gordon Fee, James DeYoung, Sarah Hurty, Dan McCartney, Charles Clayton, Kenneth [...]

The Single Meaning Principle is stated well in the words of Bernard Ramm, “Interpretation is one, application is many” (Protestant Biblical Interpretation, 113). In chapter three “Bible Interpretation—Then and Now” Zuck surveys the different methods of interpretation throughout church history. The different approaches are literal, allegorical, traditional, and rationalistic, and subjective. What separates all the approaches [...]

There is danger of integrating current culture into the process of interpreting Scripture. Terry S. Milton, Bernard Ramm, and Roy Zuck define hermeneutics as science and art. In other words, hermeneutics is rules of interpretation and the application of the rules, no more, no less. As we saw in the last post, G. D. Fee and [...]

Another important traditional work in hermeneutics is Protestant Biblical Interpretation: A Textbook of Hermeneutics by Bernard Ramm. His work was a textbook in many evangelical schools and as proof three editions appeared in the late twentieth century. Like Roy Zuck and Milton S. Terry, Ramm defines hermeneutics as both science and art: “Hermeneutics is the science [...]