Posts Tagged ‘Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones’

“Nothing is more nauseating to contemporary youth than hypocrisy, and nothing more attractive than sincerity.” With those piercing words, Stott launches his attack against hypocrisy and half-heartedness.This is my book review of John Stott’s Between Two Worlds (Chapter 7: Sincerity and Earnestness).

How can a preacher be sincere: “he means what he says when in the pulpit, and he practices what he preaches when out of it.”

Stott presents three arguments for sincerity.

1. The first argument for sincerity warns us of the dangers inherent in being a teacher (Rom. 2:17-21; Matt 23:1-3; Jas 3:1). “The reason why hypocrisy is particularly unpleasant in teachers is that it is inexcusable.”

2. The second argument for sincerity states that hypocrisy causes great offence. “We greatly hinder our own work, says Richard Baxter, if for an hour or two on Sunday we build up with our mouths, and then during the rest of the week pull down with our hands.”

3. The third argument for sincerity concerns the positive influence of being a real person.  Paul had nothing to hide as he says in 2 Cor 4:2. He could appeal to every man’s conscience. Hypocrisy repels and integrity attracts. “David Hume, was the eighteenth-century British deistic philosopher who rejected historic Christianity. A friend once met him hurrying along a London street and asked him where he was going . Hume replied that he was going to hear George Whitefield preach. ‘But surely,’ his friend asked in astonishment, ‘you don’t believe what Whitefield preaches, do you?’ ‘No, I don’t,’ answered Hume, ‘but he does.’”

“Earnestness,” Stott says, “goes one step beyond sincerity. To be sincere is to mean what we say and to do what we say; to be earnest is, in addition, to feel what we say.” “We must not talk to our congregations,” Stott quotes Spurgeon, “as if we were half asleep. Our preaching must not be articulate snoring.”

We are earnest when like Paul we are stirred to anger over idolatry because we are jealous over the glory of our God (Acts 17:16). We are earnest when we like Jesus can wept over a city of unrepentant sinners (Matt 23:37). Where are the Jeremiahs whose eyes were like a fountain of tears (Jer  9:1). Stott talks about D. L. Moody as an example of earnestness. “We are told that Dr. R. W. Dale, who for thirty-six years was pastor of Carr’s Lanes Congregational Church in Birmingham, was inclined at first to look on Mr. Moody with disfavor. But then he went to hear him, and his opinion was altered. He regarded him ever after with profound respect, and considered that he had a right to preach the gospel ‘because he could never speak of a lost soul without tears in his eyes.’”

While we cannot substitute heat for light, there must be “the combination of mind and heart, the rational and the emotional.” We need exposition and exhortation or as Spurgeon pled, that our preaching would be “as lava comes of a volcanic overflow.”

The three essentials of a sermon, according to G. C. Morgan are “truth, clarity and passion.” “On passion he told a tale of the great English actor, Macready. A preacher once asked him how he could draw such crowds by fiction, while he was preaching the truth and not getting any crowd at all. ‘This is quite simple,’ replied the actor. ‘I can tell you the difference between us. I present my fiction as though it were truth; you present your truth as though it were fiction.’”

Morgan’s successor at Westminster Chapel, Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones asked “What is preaching?” Here is his answer: “Logic on fire! . . . . It is theology on fire. And a theology which does not take fire, I maintain, is a defective theology . . . . Preaching is theology coming through a man who is on fire.”

But where does the fire in preaching come from?

“Fire in preaching depends on fire in the preacher, and this in turn comes from the Holy Spirit. Our sermons will never catch fire unless the fire of the Holy Spirit burns in our own hearts and we are ourselves ‘aglow with the Spirit’”(Rom 12:11).

From where does this Holy Spirit fire come? It comes from spending time in the Word. “The second secret was learned by the two disciples with whom Jesus walked to Emmaus on the first Easter afternoon. When he had vanished, they said to one another, ’Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the Scriptures?’” (Luke 24:32). Stott adds this important thought, “It is still truth – Christ-centered, biblical truth – which sets the heart on fire.”

Spurgeon captured the essence of Stott’s chapter 5, “He who ceases to learn has ceased to teach. He who no longer sows in the study will no more reap in the pulpit.” This chapter is the call to study both worlds (the world of Bible authors and Bible readers) to connect to our generation. Stott begins with the ancient world of the Word.

Billy Graham said to 600 pastors in London in 1979, that if he had his ministry all over again, he would make two changes. First, he would study three times as much as he had done. He would take on fewer engagements. “I’ve preached too much and studied too little.” Second, he would give more time to prayer. Sounds like the apostles in Acts 6.

Donald Grey Barnhouse (of Tenth Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia) once said, “If I had only three years to serve the Lord, I would spend two to them studying and preparing.”

Stott says that Bible study should have at least three characteristics.

Bible study first of all should be comprehensive. Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, formerly minister of Westminster Chapel, said, “I would say that all preachers should read through the whole Bible in its entirety as least once every year . . . That should be the very minimum of the preacher’s Bible reading.”

Bible study, next, should be open-minded. Stott added a third world to which we must build a bridge: The world of the interpreter or the preacher and the world of the Word. We should hear and heed God’s Word without distorting its meaning. “We should also seek increasingly to ensure that the presuppositions with which we approach the Bible are not drawn from outside the Bible (e.g. those of the humanist, the capitalist, the Marxist or the scientific secularist) but are Christian presuppositions supplied by the Bible itself.”

Bible study, lastly, should be expectant. Stott believes that pessimism in interpreting the Bible because it is complicated is hostile to the joyful expectation we should enjoy when studying the Bible. The Bible was written to churches filled with ordinary people.  Another hindrance to expectant Bible study is spiritual staleness. For the pastor who is reading through the Scriptures once a year, familiarity can breed contempt. “We must pray for the refreshment of the Holy Spirit so that, if our appetite is blunt he will sharpen it.”

The aid of different books is necessary to understanding the Bible: Christian classics, books on modern theological debates, history and biographies.

In addition to the ancient world of the Word, we must study the modern side of the great divide as well. One way to study the contemporary side is to listen to people’s problems and questions. Someone complained, “Too many shepherds of churches no longer smell like the sheep.”

Another way to bridge the gap is to read newspapers, watch some television, films and plays. The preacher also can attend monthly reading groups which focus on secular books. Stott recommended the benefit of meeting quarterly with a group of specialists to help him prepare sermons for a quarterly series on current issues.

The preacher must make a “studied neglect of distracting duties.” Stott provides three notable preachers who refused to be distracted from their preaching ministry: Joseph Parker, Campbell Morgan, and Alexander MacLaren. I will only quote Joseph Parker. He was the first minister of the City Temple in London and was in his study at 7:30 every morning. He said, “I have lived for my work. That is all. If I had talked all the week, I could not have preached on Sunday. That is all. If I had attended committee meetings, immersed myself in politics and undertaken the general care of the Empire, my strength would have been consumed. That is all. Mystery there is none.”  No wonder we still read Parker’s sermons as well as the sermons of Morgan and MacLaren.

Stott warned about two hindrances to this serious commitment to study. One hindrance is the temptation for the pastor to hold “all the ecclesiastical reins in his own hands” and not partner with other lay people in the ministry. “The church of every generation has to relearn the lesson of Acts 6.” Like the apostles, pastors must train others to do the work of the ministry so they can give themselves “to prayer and the ministry of the Word.”

The other hindrance is laziness. “Alexander Whyte spoke stern words on this subject. He ministered for forty-seven years (1860-1907) at Free St. George’s Church in Edinburgh. In 1898 he was Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, and in 1909, at the age of seventy-three, he accepted the Principalship of New College Edinburgh, in addition to his other responsibilities. He disciplined himself rigorously and abominated laziness in others. ‘I would have all lazy students drummed out of the college,’ he said in 1904, ‘and all lazy ministers out of the Assembly . . . I would have laziness held to be the one unpardonable sin in all our students and in all our ministers.’”

I want to conclude with Stott’s words on this subject with his interview with Al Mohler:

Mohler: You are probably as well known in America as in England. Furthermore, you know America — its churches and its preachers. What would be your word to the Servants of the Word on this side of the Atlantic?

Stott: I think my main word to American preachers is, as Stephen Olford has often said, that we belong in a study, not in an office. The symbol of our ministry is a Bible — not a telephone. We are ministers of the Word, not administrators, and we need to relearn the question of priority in every generation.

The Apostles were in danger of being diverted from the ministry to which they had been called by Jesus — the ministry of Word and prayer. They were almost diverted into a social ministry for squabbling widows.

Now both are important, and both are ministries, but the Apostles had been called to the ministry of the Word and not the ministry of tables. They had to delegate the ministry of the tables to other servants. We are not Apostles, but there is the work of teaching that has come to us in the unfolding of the apostolic message of the New Testament. This is our priority as pastors and preachers.