Posts Tagged ‘George Whitefield’

“Nothing is more nauseating to contemporary youth than hypocrisy, and nothing more attractive than sincerity.” With those piercing words, Stott launches his attack against hypocrisy and half-heartedness.This is my book review of John Stott’s Between Two Worlds (Chapter 7: Sincerity and Earnestness).

How can a preacher be sincere: “he means what he says when in the pulpit, and he practices what he preaches when out of it.”

Stott presents three arguments for sincerity.

1. The first argument for sincerity warns us of the dangers inherent in being a teacher (Rom. 2:17-21; Matt 23:1-3; Jas 3:1). “The reason why hypocrisy is particularly unpleasant in teachers is that it is inexcusable.”

2. The second argument for sincerity states that hypocrisy causes great offence. “We greatly hinder our own work, says Richard Baxter, if for an hour or two on Sunday we build up with our mouths, and then during the rest of the week pull down with our hands.”

3. The third argument for sincerity concerns the positive influence of being a real person.  Paul had nothing to hide as he says in 2 Cor 4:2. He could appeal to every man’s conscience. Hypocrisy repels and integrity attracts. “David Hume, was the eighteenth-century British deistic philosopher who rejected historic Christianity. A friend once met him hurrying along a London street and asked him where he was going . Hume replied that he was going to hear George Whitefield preach. ‘But surely,’ his friend asked in astonishment, ‘you don’t believe what Whitefield preaches, do you?’ ‘No, I don’t,’ answered Hume, ‘but he does.’”

“Earnestness,” Stott says, “goes one step beyond sincerity. To be sincere is to mean what we say and to do what we say; to be earnest is, in addition, to feel what we say.” “We must not talk to our congregations,” Stott quotes Spurgeon, “as if we were half asleep. Our preaching must not be articulate snoring.”

We are earnest when like Paul we are stirred to anger over idolatry because we are jealous over the glory of our God (Acts 17:16). We are earnest when we like Jesus can wept over a city of unrepentant sinners (Matt 23:37). Where are the Jeremiahs whose eyes were like a fountain of tears (Jer  9:1). Stott talks about D. L. Moody as an example of earnestness. “We are told that Dr. R. W. Dale, who for thirty-six years was pastor of Carr’s Lanes Congregational Church in Birmingham, was inclined at first to look on Mr. Moody with disfavor. But then he went to hear him, and his opinion was altered. He regarded him ever after with profound respect, and considered that he had a right to preach the gospel ‘because he could never speak of a lost soul without tears in his eyes.’”

While we cannot substitute heat for light, there must be “the combination of mind and heart, the rational and the emotional.” We need exposition and exhortation or as Spurgeon pled, that our preaching would be “as lava comes of a volcanic overflow.”

The three essentials of a sermon, according to G. C. Morgan are “truth, clarity and passion.” “On passion he told a tale of the great English actor, Macready. A preacher once asked him how he could draw such crowds by fiction, while he was preaching the truth and not getting any crowd at all. ‘This is quite simple,’ replied the actor. ‘I can tell you the difference between us. I present my fiction as though it were truth; you present your truth as though it were fiction.’”

Morgan’s successor at Westminster Chapel, Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones asked “What is preaching?” Here is his answer: “Logic on fire! . . . . It is theology on fire. And a theology which does not take fire, I maintain, is a defective theology . . . . Preaching is theology coming through a man who is on fire.”

But where does the fire in preaching come from?

“Fire in preaching depends on fire in the preacher, and this in turn comes from the Holy Spirit. Our sermons will never catch fire unless the fire of the Holy Spirit burns in our own hearts and we are ourselves ‘aglow with the Spirit’”(Rom 12:11).

From where does this Holy Spirit fire come? It comes from spending time in the Word. “The second secret was learned by the two disciples with whom Jesus walked to Emmaus on the first Easter afternoon. When he had vanished, they said to one another, ’Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the Scriptures?’” (Luke 24:32). Stott adds this important thought, “It is still truth – Christ-centered, biblical truth – which sets the heart on fire.”

God gave Ezekiel a vision of Himself riding His Chariot of Glory to prepare the preacher for his warfare of ministry. This is not the only time worship precedes warfare. The armies of Moab and Ammon arrayed themselves against King Jehoshaphat. God instructed the king how to win this battle in 2 Chronicles 20. The choir was to march in front of his army (I know some pastors who would like to take their choir out of the War Department and march them into battle): “he appointed singers unto the Lord, and that should praise the beauty of holiness, as they went out before the army, and to say, ‘Praise the LORD; for his mercy endures for ever.’” When the choir sang and praised the Lord, the enemy armies mistakenly turned on each other and wiped out their entire army.

The best preparation for a week of spiritual warfare is to worship God on Sunday. The best boot camp for each day of conflict is the worship of God before we leave for the battlefield each day.

1. The Worship of God (Chapter One)

When Ezekiel was 25, He was carried captive to Babylon in 597 B.C. Before that Daniel was taken hostage in 606 B.C. So while Jeremiah ministered to the remnant in Judah and Daniel ministered to the government officials in Babylon, Ezekiel ministered to the captives in Babylon. To equip him for this difficult ministry God gave him a vision of His glory or His presence as 1:28 reveals.

A. The vision of God’s holiness (1:4-14)

First, Ezekiel sees a storm out of the north gathering in 1:4. This storm is the impending war with Babylon who will attack for the third and final time in 586 and totally decimate Jerusalem. This storm is a powerful Hurricane Irene like storm. Out of the storm burst special angels created to worship God’s holiness 1:5-14. They are identified as Cherubim in 10:20-22 who guard God’s holiness.

When Adam and Eve sinned, God expelled them from the Garden of Eden and stationed Cherubim with flaming swords to keep Adam and Eve out. God hates sin and must punish the practice of sin.

On the Ark of the Covenant in the Tabernacle and Temple were two Cherubim on the Ark. When blood was sprinkled on the Ark before the Cherubim, God forgave the people’s sins.

In Revelation 4, these angels cease not to worship God saying, “Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.”

In your storm, worship God who is holy, who hates sin in our lives but who also forgives and cleanses when we confess.

B. The vision of God’s nearness (1:15-21) or God’s Chariot pulled by the Cherubim.

This chariot is indescribable just like the God it symbolizes. The wheels of God’s chariot of glory were like a gyroscope top in 1:15-17, which could travel in any direction with the speed of lightning. This illustrated God’s omnipresence.

The wheels were so tall they were “dreadful” or awe inspiring because of their height. There is no place God is not.

The wheels were full of eyes because God sees all. Proverbs 15:3: “The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.”

The wheels were pulled by the Cherubim and led by the Spirit in all directions in 1:19-21 because God is at work in all places. Even in Babylon.

You might be saying, “I don’t like where I am in life.” “I’m in Babylon, not Jerusalem.” This is what the captives were complaining in Psalm 137. But God tells Ezekiel and you and me, I am working in your life and circumstance where you are now.

C. The vision of God’s sovereignty (1:22-28).

Above the Cherubim pulled chariot was a platform of firmament on which rested the throne of God in 1:26. On this throne sat a man who was totally covered in fire in 1:27. This is the pre-incarnate Son of God in all his Shekinah glory. John wrote of the eternal Christ in John 1:1 and in 1:14 that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us and we held his glory. That eternal glory for the most part laid aside at his birth still flashed out on the mount of Transfiguration.

Christ who is King of kings and Lord of lord is also the man who can be touched with the feelings of our infirmities. Ezekiel falls down in worship in 1:28. Ezekiel is broken, humbled, and submissive at the feet of this holy, intimately present, and sovereign, sympathizing king.

2. The Warfare of The Believer (Chapters Two and Three)

Now we learn why God revealed Himself to Ezekiel.

A. So we can stand in our warfare (2:1-2).

Paul said it this way, “Put on the whole armor of God that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the Devil.” He did not say put on your PJs so you can sleep in.

We stand in His strength in 2:2 which comes from worshiping Him.

B. So we can stand in a warfare with rebels (2:3-7)

These rebels with whom we battle are hardhearted and stiff necked in 2:4. I read about church planters in New England who described their work as plowing concrete. Any farmers in the audience? Plowing concrete sounds rough. New England was once a place of great revival, some would the spiritual birth place of America, under Jonathan Edwards and George Whitfield. Now is a burned over area that is hardened to the Gospel. All sinners are, however, hardhearted like concrete. It will take the convicting work of the Holy Spirit to plow up and turn over the soil of the heart to receive the seed of the gospel.

C. So we can stand in warfare by eating well in 2:8-3:3.

General Napoleon said, “An army marches on its stomach.” He knew an army can have the best training, experience and equipment and still suffer defeat if they are not sufficiently fed. Apparently the authors of Scripture also advocated this military strategy. Jeremiah 15:16, “Your words were found, and I did eat them; and your word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of my heart”

Job 23:12, “Neither have I gone back from the commandment of his lips; I have esteemed the words of his mouth more than my necessary food.” Matthew 4:4, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every Word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.”

Most of us do not leave the house without eating breakfast or at least drive through McDonald’s for our sausage, egg, and cheese biscuit. So why should we march out of our battle stations without feasting on God’s Word even if it means sacrificing Facebook, Good Morning America or Fox News?

God’s Word hardens us against hardened sinners. God makes us hard headed against the hardhearted in 3:7-9. We can’t stoop to their level of rebellion in our ministry to the rebellious. We must remain resolute. Yet, God’s Word also breaks our hearts for the lost in 3:12-19.

Ezekiel hears the noise of the Cherubim pulled Chariot in 3:12-13 and is reminded of the threatening storm. God says go sit with them, i.e. network with them and warn them in 3:15-19. In all our relationships we are not just good buddies we are watchmen who warn them of the gathering judgment.

We were warned very well concerning Hurricane Irene for over a week. As of this morning 3 million homes and businesses are without power and 9 deaths have been attributed to Irene. Governmental officials, the National Hurricane Center and local meteorologists advised us to evacuate or batten down.

And yet some do not heed.

One news source reported that as the storm’s outer bands reached New York on Saturday night, two kayakers capsized and had to be rescued off Staten Island. They received summonses and a dressing-down from Bloomberg, who said they recklessly put rescuers’ lives at risk.

Jesus warned sinners to flee the wrath to come. This is a mandatory evacuation with eternal consequence if disobeyed.

Tony Evans says, “A great spiritual malady permeates the church of Jesus Christ today” (Totally Saved, page 145). Evans calls this spiritual disease ADD: Assurance Deficit Disorder. Many good people lack assurance of salvation.

When someone comes to me who is not sure about his/her salvation, I respond in one of two ways:

1. If I don’t think the person is saved, I tell him how to be saved and help lead him to Christ.

2. If I think the doubting person is saved but are lacking assurance, I ask him to read 1st John over and over again. John wrote his first Epistle to help believers with assurance according to 5:13. John uses the word “know” 39 times in First John.

Theologians teach the doctrine of preservation or perseverance of the saints. More commonly it is called “Eternal Security.” The Bible, however, calls this truth “Eternal life” as in 5:10-11.

But there is a Difference between Eternal Security and Assurance of Salvation

1. The Gospel of John was written so sinners would believe Jesus is the eternal Son of God and possess eternal life (20:31).

2. John wrote his First Epistle so believers who already possess eternal life would also enjoy assurance of their eternal life (5:13).

A. It is possible, therefore, for a believer to possess eternal life and not assurance of salvation.

There are many examples:

1) John the Baptist in prison sent his disciples to ask Jesus, “Are you the one that should come or do we look for another” (Matthew 11:2-3).

2) Doubting Thomas on resurrection Sunday said, “except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe” (John 20:25).

3) G. C. Morgan quit preaching for two years because of doubts.

4) Believers who suffer ill health or nervous disorders. Sometimes women going through the change of life and men going through mid-life crisis doubt their salvation.

5) Believers who had no great emotional experience at conversion. I had a very emotional salvation experience but one of teachers at BJU, Dr. Robert Bell saved at age 3 did not. But he was just as much saved as I was because salvation is not based on feelings but faith.

6) Believers brought up in false teachings find it difficult not to let that false teaching cause doubts. John addresses false teaching in 3:7 and 4:1. Some teach that if you sin you lose salvation.You can be saved today and lost tomorrow, they say. One day you are a Peter and the next day you are a Judas. Read John in 1:8-9. What about those who were raised in church and once believed the truth but now disavowed the truth? John says they were never believers to begin with in 2:19. Also in 2:15, if they forsake God for the world they were never believers. Paul would have agreed with John when he wrote, “Demas has forsaken me having loved this present world.”

7) Believers living out of fellowship with God. John writes about fellowship in 1:7. But if we are out of fellowship our sins are not cleansed and our communion is broken and it is like being unsaved as far as the blessings of God in our life are concerned. For example, our prayers not answered just like the unsaved do not have their prayers answered (Psalm 66:18). About the carnal Corinthians, Paul said, “are you not carnal, and walk like men (unsaved men) (1 Corinthians 3:3).

B. It is also possible for people to have assurance (a false assurance) of salvation but not eternal life.

It was this possibility that caused Jesus to rebuke the religious people of His day (John 5:39-40). They are like the foolish man who built his house on the sand. Some church members have built their lives on the sinking sands of church membership and good works.

Charles Spurgeon heard a preacher spiritualize the text in Leviticus 11:16. He was preaching truth just from the wrong passage: “The owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind.” The preacher said that the owl is a very small bird when plucked; he only looks big because he wears so many feathers, so many professors are all feathers, and if you could take away their boastful professions there would be very little left of them” (Lectures to My Students, page 107).

There are Three Tests or Evidences in First John for Assurance of Salvation

1. The Moral Test: Do I obey Christ and live righteously (2:3-6)?

2. The Social Test: Do I love one another because I love God (2:7-11)?

3. The Doctrinal Test: Do I believe Jesus is God’s Son (2:18-27)?

John repeats these three tests all through his book.

1. Moral Test: Do I obey Christ and live righteously (2:28-3:10)?

2. Social Test: Do I love one another because I love God (3:11-18)?

3. Doctrinal Test: Do I believe Jesus is God’s Son (4:1-6)?

The last repetition of the three evidences give the order in which they occur in ours.

1. The Doctrinal Test: Do I believe Jesus is God’s Son (5:1a)?

   A. We must believe that Christ was incarnate (4:1-3)?

B. We must believe that Christ is God (4:15)?

C. We know this because we know God’s Word (5:13)?

Bill Maher, the atheist comedian, was debating Bill O’Reilly about Christianity and they both got it wrong. Bill Maher said he could not believe in a God who put people to death for working on Sunday in the Old Testament. The Law dealt with the Sabbath not Sunday(Exodus 31:14). Bill O’Reilly said most of the Old Testament was not literal. Have we studied God’s Word so that we could answer these men?

George Whitfield, the great British evangelist, was speaking to a man about his salvation. He asked him, “Sir, what do you believe? “I believe what my church believes” the man replied. “And what does your church believe?” “The same thing I believe.” “And what do both of you believe?” the preacher inquired again. “We both believe the same thing” was the only replied he could get.

2. The Social Test: Do I love one another because I love God (5:1b-2a)?

   A. Love for God is the first evidence of salvation (5:1a; 4:19).

1. When someone makes a profession of faith, I don’t ask them, “Do you feel saved?” but “Do you love the Lord now?”

2. Before salvation we feared the thought of standing before God at the judgment. Look at the change salvation brings according to 4:17-18. Now with Fanny Crosby we can sing “I want to see Him and look upon His face and sing the story ‘Saved by Grace.’”

B. Love for God results in love for God’s people or family (5:1b-2a).

1. Do you love Christians (3:14)?

2. Would you rather be with believers or sinners (2:19)? Every church service is like a family reunion.

 3. The Moral Test: Do I obey Christ and live righteously (5:2c-3)?

       A. Believers do not live in sin because they love God (5:2c-3).

B. Believers overcome the world (5:4-5).

C. Believers who live righteously have their prayers answered (5:14-15).

D. Believers who sin do not get away with sin (5:16). David in Psalm 32:3-5 is an example.

E. Believers who sin confess their (1:9).

Do you have these evidences of salvation in your life? If so, take these proofs of salvation and help someone else who is struggling.

“Hell disappeared. And No One Noticed” wrote Martin Marty, American church historian. In his Harvard journal article, Marty recorded some of the preaching on hell long ago by Great Awakening evangelist George Whitefield: “George Whitefield spoke of people cast into hell, lifting up their eyes from the burning fiery Tophet that is kindled by the fury of God’s eternal wrath of this righteous Judge and head of the dreadful tribunal” (Martin Marty. Hell Disappeared. And No One Noticed. A Civic Argument. Harvard Theological Review 78:3-4 1985, 381-89).

Recent surveys confirm Marty’s thesis that preaching on punishment in the afterlife has all but disappeared from our churches. In a survey released this summer by The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, just 59 percent of 35,000 respondents said they believe in a hell. That number is down from 71% in a 2001 Gallup survey. Hell has almost burned out.

In the August 14, 2008 edition of The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life there was an article entitled “Belief in hell dips, but some say they’ve already been there.”

Charles Honey interviewed Mike Wittmer, professor of systematic theology at Grand Rapids Theological Seminary. “In a pluralistic, post-modern world, students are having a more difficult time with (the idea of) people going to hell forever because they didn’t believe the right thing,” says Mike Wittmer. “That’s the biggest question out there right now: `Would God send someone to hell if they were someone as good as me, but didn’t believe what I believe?’” “It was easier to believe in hell 20 years ago when missionaries tried to convert people in far-flung places….” “In today’s global village, many live next to good, non-Christian neighbors and wonder why an all-powerful, loving God wouldn’t eventually empty out hell….” “I’ve noticed in the last five years how that view is making inroads even in conservative churches, whereas five years ago it wasn’t even uttered or discussed.”

In the same article, Honey wrote about Ernie Long who believes he has been to hell. He can even narrow it down to a particular moment. His mother was dying of cancer. As she lay on her death bed, he swiped her last $5 and the car keys from her purse, went out and got high. When he returned, she was dead. Long goes quiet, thinking about it in the chapel of Guiding Light Mission in Grand Rapids, Mich. When he first moved to the homeless shelter, he recalls, he would wake up in the night haunted by what he’d done. “The shame and guilt engulfed me,” he says quietly. “I couldn’t stop crying.” Today, Long is an intake supervisor for Guiding Light’s recovery program. He believes Jesus saved him from the pit of hell and wants other men to be saved too, here and hereafter. “I think hell is being in the absence of purpose,” says Long, 64, who was addicted to crack cocaine before coming to Guiding Light two years ago. “When I had no purpose, no direction, I actually felt like I was living in hell.”

Evangelicals are increasingly denying the doctrine of hell. There are four defective views held by evangelicals that air condition hell.

The first view is Universalism

“Universalism teaches that since Christ died for all people without exception, it follows that all will eventually be saved.” Early church father, Origen (A. D. 185-254), first taught this doctrine which was later condemned at the Council of Constantinople in A. D. 543 (Erwin W. Lutzer. Coming to Grips with Hell Chicago: Moody, 1990, 11).

A more modern advocate is Madeleine L’Engle in The Irrational Season: “No matter how many eons it takes he (God) will not rest until all of creation, including Satan is reconciled to him, until here is no creature who cannot return his look of love with a joyful response of love” (New York: Seabury Press, 1977, 97). According to Hebrews 2:14, the death of Christ was not for Satan’s redemption but his defeat. Also, John predicts the final and eternal destiny of Satan in the Lake of Fire (Revelation 20:10). Jesus preached that not all are going to heaven: “These shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal” (Matthew 25:46).

The second view is Annihilationism

“Those who deny eternal conscious punishment often advocate ‘annihilationism,’ a teaching that, after the wicked have suffered the penalty of God’s wrath for a time, God will ‘annihilate’ them so that they no longer exist” (Wayne Grudem, Sytematic Theology, 1149). Some believe the unrighteous will be resurrected at the final judgment not to be sent to eternal conscious suffering but to be annihilation.

The third view is Conditional Immortality

“A variation of the view that God will eventually annihilate unbelievers (annihilationism proper) is the view called ‘conditional immortality,’ the idea that God has created people so that they only have immortality (the power to live forever) if they accept Christ as Savior. Those who do not become Christians, then, do not have the gift of immortal life and at death or at the time of final judgment they simply cease to exist. This view is very close to that of annihilationism, and I have not discussed it separately in this chapter. (Some versions of conditional immortality deny conscious punishment altogether, even for a brief time.) (Grudem, 1150). This is the view of John R. W. Stott in Essentials: A Liberal-Evangelical Dialogue and Clark Pinnock in The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent.

A fourth view denies the of Literalness of Fire in Hell

“All descriptions and depictions of heaven and hell in the Bible are symbolic and metaphorical. Each metaphor suggests one aspect of the experience of hell. (For example, ‘fire’ tells us of the disintegration, while ‘darkness’ tells us of the isolation.) Having said that does not at all imply that heaven or hell themselves are ‘metaphors.’ They are very much realities. Jesus ascended (with his physical body, mind you) into heaven. The Bible clearly proposes that heaven and hell are actual realities, but also indicates that all language about them is allusive, metaphorical, and partial” (Tim Keller, The Reason for God, New York: Dutton, 2008, 259). Tim Keller advocates this view in chapter Five: “How Can a Loving God Send People to Hell?”

Since the end result of both Annihilation and Conditional Immortality are the same, the unsaved do not suffer consciously for eternity, I will refer only to Annihilationism. In Part Two, I will give the arguments for annihilation and Scriptural refutations.