Posts Tagged ‘R. A. Torrey’

Titanic-Sinking

Adrian Rogers, in a sermon, told of an elderly widow who lived in an old apartment. She loved the Lord. Her landlord was not a Christian and even ridiculed the widow for being a narrow-minded religious fanatic. On one occasion, she ran out of groceries and prayed for God to supply her need. The landlord could hear her praying through the paper-thin apartment walls. He decided to play a trick on her. While she was out the landlord bought a large amount of groceries, used the passkey, and placed them in her room. When she returned, she began to praise the Lord. She then marched over to the landlord’s room and bragged on the Lord for His answering her prayer. The landlord rebuked her. He said, “God didn’t answer your prayer, I bought those groceries and here is the receipt.” The godly widow responded, “No! You are wrong. God did answer my prayer, even if He did have to use the devil!” God is not limited in how He accomplishes His will in our lives. Our Creator is creative.

Part of Habakkuk’s problem was God’s use of the wicked Babylonians to chastise God’s people.

There is an important progression in Habakkuk’s life from chapter one to chapter three: a growth in the grace and knowledge of Christ Jesus.

The Book of Habakkuk opens with the prophet sparring with God. Habakkuk is verbally battling with his Creator. Questioning Him! Complaining to Him! Habakkuk, however, finds out that his arms are too short to box with God.

In Habakkuk One, Habakkuk is worrying and focusing on his problem. In Habakkuk Two, Habakkuk is waiting and trusting In his God. He drops his weary too short arms. In Habakkuk Three, Habakkuk is worshiping and focusing on his God. He takes off the gloves and falls to the mate in surrender. The circumstances in Habakkuk’s life did not change. As a matter of fact, the circumstance got worse. What changed was Habakkuk’s attitude.

Where are you this today? Worrying, focusing on your problem, blaming God, waiting and trusting on God to answering your prayer, or worshiping God.

In Habakkuk 3:16-19, Habakkuk shows us

1. What To Do When We Are Personally Devastated? (3:16b)

The physical and personal devastation is seen in 3:16.

When Habakkuk heard in 1:5-11, that God was raising up the wicked nation of Babylon to chastise His sinning people, Habakkuk was visibly shaken: from the inside/out, from his bones to his belly, and from his head to his toes. He trembled all over.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon was London’s most loved and hated preacher. When Metropolitan Tabernacle was being enlarged, he and his congregation met in the Crystal Palace. The main floor was full as well as the wrap around balcony. During the first sermon, someone, many think an enemy of Spurgeon’s shouted, “Fire” in the wooden building.  A stampede pursued and several people killed. As Spurgeon watched the panic, he fainted in the pulpit and sank into depression for several weeks.

Perhaps you have experienced this devastation. At the doctor’s office you learn you have a terminal sickness. Your spouse tells you he/she wants out of this marriage. You get an email at work informing you that a layoff will occur shortly. You have huge mortgage payments. One of your children has abandoned the faith. Someone you love dearly is in the ICU on life support and the doctor says that you have to make a decision. This week two church members have asked me to pray for two separate and unrelated car accidents where teenagers were killed.

The solution is to rest on God’s promises (3:16b).

God was fulfilling His Covenant promises in allowing a wicked nation to punish His people, Israel (Deuteronomy 28:25). God also promised His people in Deuteronomy 30:1-2, that He would regather them if they repented. Habakkuk is resting on God’s promises.

The word “rest” in 3:16 is the word used to describe what God did when He finished His six days of creation. On the seventh day (Exodus 20:11) God rested. This does not mean that God was exhausted and physically took a 15-minute break. It means God ceased His creation activity. God did not stop all of His activity; He just stopped His creation activity. He ceased one activity. God still works in sustaining His creation now (John 5:17).

Habakkuk also ceased an activity. He ceased worrying and focusing on his problem. His new activity was faith in God’s promises and worship of the God who gave the promises. Romans 8:28 is one of those promises.

R. A. Torrey called Romans 8:28 “a soft pillow for a tried heart.” In your deepest, most devastating trial, you can rest on promises like Romans 8:28: “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”

John R. Rice in his book on prayer recorded someone’s prayer: “Dear God, I hate bacon powder. Dear God, I hate floor. Dear God, I hate shortening. But Dear Jesus, you put them all together and stir them up and put them in the oven and cook it and I put some butter between it, and I sure love hot, homemade biscuits.” That is the promise of Romans 8:28. This verse does not promise that all things are good. But that all things work together for good for them who love God. All circumstances are not good. The cancer report is not good. The news of the spouse who wants out of the marriage is not good. The layoff is not good. The rebellious child is not good. The loved one in ICU is not good. The killing of teenagers in car accidents is not good. But the God who created and runs the universe can bring good out of the bad.

In my next post, Habakkuk will shows us what to do when our circumstances are devastating.

The Book of Habakkuk opens with the prophet sparring with God. Habakkuk is verbally battling with his Creator. Questioning Him! Complaining to Him! Habakkuk, however, finds out that his arms are too short to box with God.

Part of Habakkuk’s problem was God’s use of the wicked Babylonian to chastise God’s people.

Adrian Rogers, in a sermon, told of an elderly widow who lived in an old apartment. She loved the Lord. Her landlord was not a Christian and even ridiculed the widow for being a narrow minded religious fanatic. On one occasion, she ran out of groceries and prayed for God to supply her need. The landlord could hear her praying through the paper thin apartment walls. He decided to play a trick on her. While she was out the landlord bought a large amount of groceries, used the pass key, and placed them in her room. When she returned, she began to praise the Lord. She then marched over to the landlord’s room and bragged on the Lord for His answering her prayer. The landlord rebuked her. He said, “God didn’t answer your prayer, I bought those groceries and here is the receipt.” The godly widow responded, “No! You are wrong. God did answer my prayer, even if He did have to use the devil!” God is not limited in how He accomplishes His will in our lives. Our Creator is creative.

There is an important progression in Habakkuk’s life from chapter one to chapter three: a growth in the grace and knowledge of Christ Jesus.

In Habakkuk One, Habakkuk is worrying and focusing on his problem. He is sparring with God.

In Habakkuk Two, Habakkuk is waiting and trusting In his God. He drops his weary too short arms.

In Habakkuk Three, Habakkuk is worshiping and focusing on his God. He takes off the gloves and falls to the mate in surrender. The circumstances in Habakkuk’s life did not change. As a matter of fact, the circumstance got worse. What changed was Habakkuk’s attitude.

Where are you this today? Worrying, focusing on your problem, blaming God, waiting and trusting on God to answering your prayer, or worshiping God.

In Habakkuk 3:16-19, Habakkuk shows us

1. What To Do When We Are Personally Devastated? (3:16b)

A. The physical and personal devastation is seen in 3:16.

When Habakkuk heard in 1:5-11, that God was raising up the wicked nation of Babylon to chastise His sinning people, Habakkuk was visibly shaken: from the inside/out, from his bones to his belly, and from his head to his toes. He trembled all over.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon was London’s most loved and hated preacher. When Metropolitan Tabernacle was being enlarged, he and his congregation met in the Crystal Palace. The main floor was full as well as the wrap around balcony. During the first sermon, someone, many think an enemy of Spurgeon’s shouted “Fire” in the wooden building.  A stampede pursued and several people killed. As Spurgeon watched the panic, he fainted in the pulpit and sank into depression for several weeks.

Perhaps you have experienced this devastation. At the doctor’s office you learn you have a terminal sickness. Your spouse tells you he/she wants out of this marriage. You get an email at work informing you that a layoff will occur shortly and you have huge mortgage payments. One of your children has abandoned the faith. Someone you love dearly is in the ICU on life support and the doctor says that you have to make a decision. This week two church members have asked me to pray for two separate and unrelated car accidents where teenagers were killed.

B. The solution is to rest on God’s promises (3:16b).

God was fulfilling His Covenant promises in allowing a wicked nation to punish His people, Israel (Deuteronomy 28:25). God also promised His people in Deuteronomy 30:1-2, that He would regather them if they repented. Habakkuk is resting on God’s promises.

The word “rest” in 3:16  is the word used to describe what God did when He finished His six days of creation. On the seventh day (Exodus 20:11) God rested. This does not mean that God was exhausted and had to physically take a 15 minute break. It means God ceased His creation activity. God did not stop all of His activity; He just stopped His creation activity. He ceased one activity. God still works in sustaining His creation now (John 5:17).

Habakkuk also ceased an activity. He ceased worrying and focusing on his problem. His new activity was faith in God’s promises and worship of the God who gave the promises. Romans 8:28 is one of those promises.

R. A. Torrey called Romans 8:28 “a soft pillow for a tried heart.” In your deepest, most devastating trial, you can rest on promises like Romans 8:28: “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”

John R. Rice in his book on prayer recorded someone’s prayer: “Dear God, I hate bacon powder. Dear God, I hate floor. Dear God, I hate shortening. But Dear Jesus, you put them all together and stir them up and put them in the oven and cook it and I put some butter between it, and I sure love hot, homemade biscuits.” That is the promise of Romans 8:28. This verse does not promise that all things are good. But that all things work together for good for them who love God. All circumstances are not good. The cancer report is not good. The news of the spouse who wants out of the marriage is not good. The layoff is not good. The rebellious child is not good. The loved one in ICU is not good. The killing of teenagers in car accidents is not good. But the God who created and runs the universe can bring good out of the bad.

In my next post, Habakkuk will shows us what to do when our circumstances are devastating.

Why is there so much confusion about the baptism of the Holy Spirit today? The eight different views that we have identified is cause enough for the confusion. There is confusion because of past Bible teachers in the camp of “Second Blessing” Fundamentalists, like Torrey, Moody, and Rice, who taught incorrectly the doctrine of Spirit Baptism. They taught that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit gave power for witnessing.

The basis of their incorrect doctrine was Acts 1:5 where Jesus said the disciples, who were already believers, would be baptized soon. Baptism is not mentioned on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2 whereas filling is mentioned. The two ministries of the Holy Spirit are thought to be the same. In the transitional book of Acts, both ministries of the Holy Spirit did happen on the Day of Pentecost. Peter’s account in Acts 11:15-16 shows that the baptism of the Holy Spirit happened on the Day of Pentecost.

From the Epistles, which are God’s final word on doctrine, we learn that the baptism and filling of the Holy Spirit are different and that Spirit baptism occurs at salvation. How are the baptism and filling of the Holy Spirit different?

Believers are never commanded to be baptized with the Holy Spirit, because believers have already been baptized into the Body of Christ at conversion. Paul in 1 Cor 12:13 says the ministry of the Holy Spirit is past for all believers: “For by one Spirit were we all baptized into one body.”

In Eph. 4:5, Paul says, “There is one body, and one Spirit, even as you are called in one hope of your calling, one Lord, one faith, one baptism.” The “one baptism” has to be the baptism of the Holy Spirit and not water baptism, because all believers have not been baptized in water, but all believers have been baptized by the Holy Spirit into the body of Christ.

Ryrie mentions seven passages that specifically refer to the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The first five references refer prophetically to the Day of Pentecost: Mt. 3:11; Mk. 1:8; Lk. 3:16; John 1:33; Acts 1:5. The next reference is the historical fulfillment at the Day of Pentecost (Acts 11:5-7).The final reference is to Baptism of the Spirit that all believers have received at the time of conversion (1 Cor. 12:13). In contrast to Holy Spirit baptism, believers are commanded to be filled by the Holy Spirit in Eph. 5:18.

Not only is there confusion because of the erroneous teaching of past “Second Blessing” Fundamentalists but because of present day groups that teach that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is subsequent to salvation. Again this view is based on the transitional book of Acts and not a correct understanding the Epistles. There is no norm for receiving the Holy Spirit in the book of Acts. There are four groups that received the Holy Spirit differently in the book of Acts. (1) In Acts 2, Jewish believers are Spirit baptized after salvation and speak in tongues (2) Acts 8, Samaritan believers are Spirit baptized after salvation and do not speak in tongues (3) Acts 10, Gentiles are Spirit baptized at salvation and do speak in tongues (4) Acts 19, OT believers are Spirit baptized after salvation and speak in tongues.

“The anointing is universally and equally applied to all believers, irrespective of race, age, gender, or legal status. In fact, this is Luke’s purpose: to demonstrate that all people who believe—Jew and Gentile alike—share in the anointing of Pentecost . . . . After the three ethnic groups of Acts 8, 10, 19 are shown to be incorporated into Christ’s purposes, Luke mentions these transitional acts no more. Christ’s intent of a universal church has been clearly expressed. We can assume that Paul’s statement of 1 Cor. 12:12-13 is now the norm: (Russell, The Anointing With the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts, Trinity Journal, 1986, p. 62).

There is also confusion because the baptism of the Holy Spirit is made an experience to be sought. The baptism of the Holy Spirit is not an experience to be sought by “Second Blessing” Fundamentalist nor by Charismatics. Because Holy Spirit Baptism is universal among all believers it is not experiental. It is not a question of spiritual maturity, yieldedness, or indoctrination. Every believer, while totally unconscious of the reality of this truth until taught, is baptized by the Spirit as soon as faith is place in Christ.

“Baptism is not experimental because it is positional truth. While our position in Christ is the ground of our experience when we are yielded to the Spirit, our position in itself does not produce experience. All Christians have the same position in Christ, but many have little spiritual experience” (John Walvoord, The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit, Dallas: Dallas Theological Seminary, 1943, pp. 162, 163).

The Christian gets his power for witnessing from the filling of the Holy Spirit (Acts 4:31) not from the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The Christian gets his power for holy living from the filling of the Holy Spirit (Gal. 5:22, 23) not the baptism of the Holy Spirit.

When you hear the words, Baptism of the Holy Spirit what comes to your mind? For some there are scenes of highly emotional church services accompanied with tongues. For others, a confusing mix of ideas from different studies and sermons muddies the thinking. That is understandable because there are many conflicting views. In part one, I am going to review eight views of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. I am taking some of my information from Dr. Windsor’s notes on Pneumatology at Central Baptist Theological Seminary. In part two, I will discuss the Traditional view of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.

(1) Church of Christ emphasizes water baptism (baptismal regeneration) and not Spirit baptism.

(2) Landmark Baptists stress the local church and not the universal body of Christ with an emphasis on water baptism (not baptismal regeneration) and not Spirit baptism. “The word ‘baptized’ unless clearly meant to be figurative, must mean water baptism, for this is its basic meaning” (Anderson, Baptist Unshackled, p. 106).

James Robinson Greaves is known as the father of Landmarkism. In 1851, Graves called a meeting at the Cotton Grove Baptist Church in Jackson, Tennessee to react to the liberalism creeping into the Southern Baptist Churches. This group formed the Cotton Grove Resolutions which became the organizational document for Landmarkism (1) Can Baptists with their principles on the Scriptures, consistently recognize those societies not organized according to the Jerusalem church, but possessing different government, different officers, a different class of members, different ordinances, doctrines and practices as churches of Christ? (2) Ought they to be called gospel churches or churches in a religious sense? (3) Can we consistently recognize the ministers of such irregular and unscriptural bodies as gospel ministers? (4) Is it not virtually recognizing them as official ministers to invite them into our pulpits or by any other act that would or could be construed as such recognition? (5) Can we consistently address as brethren those professing Christianity who not only have not the doctrine of Christ and walk not according to his commandments but are arrayed in direct and bitter opposition to them?

The following syllogism expresses Landmarkism. Major premise: To be valid, Christian ordinations and baptisms must be performed by a valid New Testament church. Minor premise: Only valid Baptist churches are valid New Testament churches. Conclusion: Therefore, only ordinations and baptisms performed by valid Baptist churches are valid Christian ordinations and baptisms. Dr. Mike Stallard has an excellent article at his website entitled The Significance of the Central Motif and Stratification for Method: A Case Study of Landmark Baptist Theology.                                    

(3) Pentecostal Theology believes that usually the baptism of the Holy Spirit is subsequent to salvation and is evidenced by speaking in tongues and all of the spiritual gifts are operative for today and must be sought. “The baptism of believers in the Holy Ghost is witnessed by the initial physical sign of speaking with other tongues as the Spirit of God gives them utterance” (Constitution of Assemblies of God).

(4) Charismatics, unlike Pentecostals, are not dogmatic on the timing of the baptism of the Holy Spirit, (whether at conversion or subsequent) nor the evidence of speaking in tongues.

(5) The “Third Wave” movement is another Charismatic renewal movement with an emphasis on “Power Evangelism.” The late, John Wimber, and former senior pastor of the Vineyard Christian Fellowship in Anaheim, California described “Power Evangelism:”

“Power evangelism is evangelism that is preceded and undergirded by supernatural demonstrations of God’s presence. . . .Usually this takes the form of  words of knowledge . . . healing, prophecy, and deliverance from evil spirits” (John Wimber, Power Evangelism, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1986, p. 45).

“They teach, however, that baptism in the Holy Spirit happens to all Christians at conversion, and that subsequent experiences are better called ‘filling’ with the Holy Spirit” (Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994, p. 763). Wayne Grudem was trained Westminster Seminary (a Covenant theology seminary) and yet he is a part of the Vineyard movement. He represents the Third Wave when he writes “as far as the apostle Paul was concerned, baptism in the Holy Spirit occurred at conversion.” Wayne Grudem’s view on speaking in tongues is different from Traditional Dispensationalism as the following statement reveals. “While an experience of being filled with the Holy Spirit may result in the gift of speaking in tongues, or in the use of some other gifts that had not previously been experienced, it also may come without the gift of speaking in tongues. In fact, many Christians throughout history have experienced powerful infillings of the Holy Spirit that have not been accompanied by speaking in tongues. With regard to this gift as well as all other gifts, we must simply say that the Holy Spirit ‘apportions each one individually as he will’ (1 Cor.12:11)’” (Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994, 768, 784).

(6) “Second Blessing” Fundamentalists believe there is a second work of the Holy Spirit after salvation to empower the believer for service and soulwinning. Men like D. L. Moody and R. A. Torrey called this second work the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Others like John R. Rice did not call it the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Here are John R. Rice’s comments:

In that great book, The Holy Spirit: Who He Is, and What He Does, Dr. R. A. Torrey in chapter five gives three defining statements as to what the baptism of the Holy Spirit is. So, before we consider the experiences of great soul winners and how they were filled with the Spirit, let us consider Dr. Torrey’s definition. Dr. Torrey says the following:

(1) In the first place, the Baptism of the Holy Spirit is a definite experience of which one may know whether he has received it or not. . . .(2) In the second place, the Baptism with the Holy Spirit is a work of the Holy Spirit distinct from and additional to His regenerating work. . .(3) In the third place, the Baptism with the Holy Spirit is a work of the Holy Spirit always connected with and primarily for the purpose of testimony and service.

While we do not insist on the term, “the Baptism with the Holy Spirit,” we believe Dr. Torrey has given a good definition of this special enduement of power from on high (John Rice, The Power of Pentecost or The Fullness of the Spirit, Wheaton: Sword of the Lord Publishers, 1949, p. 392.).

(7) Covenant Theology does not address the doctrine of the Holy Spirit extensively. Wayne Grudem admits this point: “Systematic theology books have not traditionally included a chapter on baptism in the Holy Spirit or filling with the Holy Spirit as part of the study of the ‘order of salvation,’ the study of the various steps in which the benefits of  salvation are applied to our lives” (p. 763). More recent covenant theologian, Robert Reymond writes “The baptism of the Holy Spirit is the work of the glorified Christ and is tantamount to the Spirit’s regenerating work. It precedes and is the precondition to faith in Christ, while the Spirit’s sealing follows upon faith in Christ” (Robert Reymond, Systematic Theology, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, page 764). As a covenant theologian, Reymond believes regeneration precedes faith.  This really fits the covenant theology view that NT water baptism which includes infants and as an ordinance symbolizes Holy Spirit baptism (Reymond, page 928), replaces the OT circumcision as the sign of “imputation of the righteousness of faith” (Reymond, page 937). Here is another example of Covenant theology emphasizing the continuity between the OT Israel and NT church. Dispensationalism stresses the discontinuity between Israel and the Church and would say that water baptism which is only for believers does not replace OT circumcision of unbelieving infants.

(8) Reformed Baptist like covenant theologians believe that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is more than identification with the body of Christ but also includes other ministries of the Holy Spirit such as empowerment for service.

1. The normative dispensational view is expressed by Dr. Windsor from Central Baptist Theological Seminary: “Baptism by the Spirit into Christ is a non-experiential, judicial placement of the convert into Christ. He thus becomes a member of the universal church (or body of the church)” (Dr. Windsor, Systematic Theology 402 Notes, page 43).

2. Covenant theologian, Wayne Grudem writes that the “‘baptism in the Holy Spirit,’ therefore, must refer to the activity of the Holy Spirit at the beginning of the Christian life when he gives us new spiritual life (in regeneration) and cleanses us and gives a clear break with the power and love of sin (the initial stage of sanctification). In this way ‘baptism in the Holy Spirit’ refers to all that the Holy Spirit does at the beginning of our Christian lives” (Grudem, page 768). Holy Spirit baptism does not include all of these ministries of the Holy Spirit just the identification of the believer with the body of Christ.

These other ministries of the Holy Spirit are unique but separate ministries called regeneration, sanctification, and filling.

3. The reformed Baptist view on baptism of the Holy Spirit is represented by Robert McCabe and Leon Wood. The Reformed Baptist view is a move in the direction  of the Covenant Theology position. The Leon Wood writes his point of view: “The last matter to notice is that baptism involves a certain aspect of empowerment for the believer.” Wood quotes Acts 1:8 to Biblically support his view. Acts 1:8, however, is prophesying the filling of the Holy Spirit that the disciples received on the Day of Pentecost in addition to the baptism and indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Charismatics, Pentecostals, Third Wavers, and “Second Blessing” fundamentalists make the baptism of the Holy Spirit experiential when it is positional in Scripture and not an experience we seek. In part two, I will discuss the Traditional view of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.

Buchenwald Slave Labor CampIs life fair?” “Are all men created equal?” “Is every one born with a silver spoon in his mouth?” “Does every cloud have a silver lining?” “Is all pain equally distributed throughout the earth?” I asked my friends on Facebook to give me examples of innocent people who suffered because of the sins of others. Here are some of the unedited examples they sent me.

“Kids who have been abused, kids in Africa that have contracted AIDS through their mothers who were mistreated.”

“A drunk driver who kills someone-the family suffers.”

“Divorce. Just because the husband and wife refuse to work things out, the child suffers greatly. He or She is constantly being moved from home to home, not having a constant father figure while seeing no love between their parents. Selfishness in marriage which leads to divorce is devastating not only to the child but to everyone else who is around the couple.”

“The Holocaust”

Elie Wiesel is a Nobel Prize winner, author, and Jewish survivor of Holocaust at Auschwitz. In the picture, Elie is the seventh man on the second row of beds.  ”In the concentration camp, he was compelled to witness the hanging of two Jewish men and one Jewish boy. The two men died almost instantly, but the lad struggled for about a half-hour on the gallows. Someone behind Wiesel muttered, ‘Where is God? Where is He?’ Then a voice within him seemed to say, ‘He is hanging there on the gallows.’”[1] “Where is God?” He is here! God is not remote, untouched, or uninvolved but in the fiery furnace with us. He is not only exaltedly transcendent but intimately immanent.

The skeptics have several arguments with the problem of evil and the existence of God.

First Argument of the Skeptic: How can God and Suffering Co-exist?

David_Hume, the eighteenth century philosopher, is often quoted as articulating the problem of evil and the existence of God: “Is He willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is impotent. Is He able but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Whence then is evil?”[2]

Does this argument solve the dilemma? Those who reject God say evolution is the alternative to the existence of God juxtaposed with suffering, rejection, hunger, and death. But is evolution problem free? Tim Keller exposes the weakness of that logic: “The evolutionary mechanism of natural selection depends on death, destruction, and violence of the strong against the weak-these things are all perfectly natural.”[3] If only the strong survive in evolution then the innocent suffer. So the elimination of God has not eradicated the suffering of the innocence.

Paul wrote that “All things (which has to include the evil of child molestation, death by drunk drivers, divorce, rape, murder, etc.) work together for good” in Romans 8:28. Paul did not say all these evils are good but that God can use evil for good. One preacher, R. A. Torrey, said Romans 8:28 was a soft pillow for a tried heart. During World War II, another prominent preacher called Romans 8:28 “the hardest verse in the Bible.” So which is it? I recently visited the emergency room at Forsyth Hospital and meet a wife who had just been dealt the devastating blow that her 44 year husband had died and her 13 year old son who sat by her side was visibly in shock. The mother-in-law said to me out in the hall of the hospital, “I see no purpose in this.” Is Romans 8:28 a soft pillow or the hardest verse in the Bible for this family? Which is it to you?

This strategic verse must be interpreted in the context of the entire book of Romans. The overarching theme of Romans is the Righteousness of God through the Gospel. In chapters 1-8, Paul develops this truth doctrinally.

  • In chapters 1:18-3:20, Paul argues like a defense attorney that all people are guilty sinners. Evil is not just in the world, evil is in each of us. The skeptic is hypocritical when he points out the evil of God allowing innocent people to suffer and die as if the skeptic has never cause an innocent person to suffer, like his parent, or his child or his spouse. Besides there are no innocent victims as Paul states in his concluding argument: “There is none righteous, no, not one” (3:10). C. S. Lewis said, “Natural disasters do not increase deaths, all of us will die.”
  • In chapters 3:21-5:21, Paul gives hope for the sinner in the doctrine of justification by faith alone.
  • In chapters 6-8, Paul demonstrates that the doctrine of sanctification is the result of justification by faith.

In chapter 6, Paul outlines the steps of sanctification
In chapter 7, Paul admits there are struggles in sanctification
In chapter 8, Paul rejoices in the security of sanctification

Chapter eight begins with “no condemnation” and ends with “no separation” for those who “walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit” (8:4). If you have been justified you will have a changed life which gives assurance. You and I can and must have this assurance in the midst of evil and suffering. In Romans 8:1-25, the whole planet is “groaning” and suffering under the curse. Sometimes when the earth groans there is an earthquake, or a hurricane, or a mudslide, or a tornado. That suffering gets closer home for the believer in Romans 8:26-27, where we come to such a low point of weakness we do not know how to pray.

In Romans 8:28-30, Paul declares that God has determined from eternity past our likeness to Christ (perfect sanctification) in eternity future and is presently using daily circumstances to painfully fashion that likeness.

Scripture’s Argument: God and Suffering must Co-exist.

What is the greatest example of suffering in human history? The Holocaust where six million Jews were massacred? The tsunami in December of 2004 which killed 250,000 people? The terrorist attack on 911 in which 2740 died? As horrific as all of these tragedies were, there is one example that is in a class all by itself. That example is found in our chapter: “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh” (Romans 8:3).

The skeptic says that God and suffering cannot coexist, but Scriptures affirm they have to co-exist for there to be salvation from present sin and all future suffering.

Was God at the cross? The God/Man was on the cross: “God sending his own Son.”

Was suffering at the cross? Christ “in the likeness of sinful flesh” died for our sins.

Was evil at the cross? God “condemned sin in the flesh” of His Son.

God and suffering also co-exist in our lives. These daily circumstances include the “all things” of evil and suffering. The neuter plural adjective παντα “all things” has no restrictions. The Skeptic in you might be saying, “I wish Paul would have used the masculine. My masculine knight in shining armor just dumped me for another damsel in distress. Others of you are thinking, “I wish Paul would have used the feminine. There is this feminine doll on campus, and I am in love with her, but she doesn’t even know my name.” When Paul used the neuter he included “all things” including your masculine and feminine problems. God is in your suffering accomplishing His will. Maybe you were dumped so God can lead Mr. Right into your life. Maybe see doesn’t know your name now but when it is God’s time she will bear your name. Maybe, don’t take that statement as a prophecy or an absolute.

Second Argument of the Skeptic: Why did God make His Son Suffer?

Some today are accusing God of Divine child abuse. Instead of Sola Scriptura (only Scripture), their view is Sola Cultura (only culture). Just because there is injustice in society you cannot force that reality on the meaning of the cross. Did only the Son suffer at the cross. No! Did God drop his Son off on the doorstep of earth and abandon him?

Scriptures’ Argument: God suffered at the Cross. 2 Cor 5:19 “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself.” Can deity suffer? Yes! Those who teach that God cannot suffer teach the impassibility of God, that is, He is incapable of feeling pain. God is not only deity but personality. God the Spirit (who has no human body or nature like Christ) can be grieved. “Grieve” is a love word. Who can grieve a parent? The neighbor? The fellow employee? No! Only a child. We are made in the image of God who has intellect, will, and emotions. Romans 8:32 gives us a unique look at the suffering (not redemptive) of the Father at the cross.

The Skeptic in you might be asking, “Why is God making me suffer?” God is also with you in your suffering. God did not save you and drop you off on the doorstep of life and abandon you. God is mentioned twice in 8:28. Once “God” is an implied subject in 8:28. Here is how Paul wrote Romans 8:28 “and we know that to those who are loving God all things (“He” implied) works together for good.” We don’t have to guess as to why God is making us suffering or what is the “good” is in verse 28. The answer is in verse 29: So that we can be conformed to the image of God’s Son.

Someone defined “Providence as the Hand of God in the glove of my circumstance.” Just as God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself, God in is you conforming you to the likeness of Christ.” Your pain, sufferings, troubles are not in vain.

Third Argument of the Skeptic: Why did God not create us where we could only choose Good?

Because He wants us to choose to “love” Him just as He chose to love us. You who are married, would you want to be married to Star Wars C-3PO? Maybe sometimes?

My wife and I are doing the 40 day Love Dare. We watched Fireproof and I bought two Love Dare books. I especially liked day three which was a Wednesday where we were to buy our spouse something during the day that told them that we were thinking of them. I bought my wife a Craftsman 3/8 socked wrench and told her that on Saturday we could take her new socket wrench and together change the oil and bound. Actually, I bought her a rose. She put the rose in a vase on the dining room table and bragged on its beauty everyday and it sat there until the peddles wilted, turned black, and dropped off. Would it have meant as much if I were C-3PO and before I left for work that Wednesday she commanded me. “Bring home a rose for me?”

Dr. J. Robertson McQuilkin was formerly the president of Columbia Bible College and Seminary….He is a conference speaker and author of note. But none of those credentials exceed his exemplary and heart-gripping love for his ailing wife, Muriel. She has walked down the grim and lonely world of Alzheimer’s disease for the last twenty years. Dr. McQuilkin gave up his presidency and numerous other responsibilities to care for her and to love her. He has penned his emotional journey in one of the most magnificent little books ever written. At one point in the book he recounts this incident:

Once our flight was delayed in Atlanta, and we had to wait a couple of hours. Now that’s a challenge. Every few minutes, the same questions, the same answers about what we’re doing here, when are we going home? And every few minutes we’d take a fast pace walk down the terminal in earnest search of-what? Muriel had always been a speed walker. I had to jog to keep up with her!

An attractive woman sat across from us, working diligently on her computer. Once, when we returned from an excursion, she said something, without looking up from her papers. Since no one spoke to me or at least mumbled in protest of our constant activity, “Pardon?” I asked.

“Oh,” she said, “I was just asking myself, ‘Will I ever find a man to love me like that?’”[4] When I read this love story the thought hit me: Is God asking, “Will I ever find a believer to love me like that?”

The Scriptures say God created us to choose to love Him voluntarily, willfully, and sacrificially. Do we? There are answers for the skeptic in the world and in you in Romans 8:28. Let God encourage you and strengthen your faith through this powerful verse.

First book review The Reason For God
Second book review part 1
Second book review part 2 “Exclusivity”

[1] Erwin W. Lutzer. Ten Lies About God (Nashville:Nelson, 2000) 75.

[2] Timothy Keller. Reason For God (New York: Dutton, 2008) 249.

[3] Ibid., 26.

[4] Ravi Zacharias. Jesus Among Other Gods (Nashville: Nelson, 2000) 129.