Posts Tagged ‘The reason for God’

Week  10 Assignment: Read pages 321-329 in MacArthur and Ephesians 6:5-9. Read and comment on the four posts for week ten.

Mark Driscoll said in his sermon on Slaves and Masters, “Slavery is a shameful page in the history of our nation and history of the American church. Many of the framers of our Constitution claimed to be Christians who considered white men to be created by God with inherent rights deserving representation. But, many were also slave owners who claimed black men deserved only 3/5 representation (as if they were less image bearers of God), an atrocity not corrected until the passage of the 13th Amendment.” The Emancipation Proclamation was only an Executive Order from President Lincoln that freed slaves but did not make the institution of slavery illegal. That required the 13th Amendment.

Tim Keller agrees when he writes “a deep stain on Christian history is the African slave trade. Since Christianity was dominant in the nations that bought and sold slaves during that time, the churches must bear responsibility along with their societies for what happened.” This is one of the many arguments that skeptics raise against Christianity that Keller addresses in “The Reason for God.”

It is a tragic fact that not only did our nation split over slavery but major denominations in America split over New World Slavery: The Presbyterians split in 1838 and the Methodists in 1844. The Southern Baptist Convention was established in 1845 in Augusta, Georgia in order to maintain human slavery. This is regrettable. The southern cotton plantations needed cheap labor whereas the more industrialized north did not.

Scriptures on slavery in the Bible were used to justify slavery in America. There is a problem, however, using verses on slavery in the Bible to justify slavery in America because the two are not equal. “Slavery was taken for granted in all of ancient society” (Homer Kent. Treasures of Wisdom . Grand Rapids: Baker, 1978, 156).

  • Slavery in the Old Testament was protected against abuse (Exodus 21:2).
  • Slaves maimed by their masters were set free (Exodus 21:26-27).
  • The murder of slaves was a capital offense (Exodus 21:12).
  • Kidnapping (a major source for the African slave trade) was forbidden (Deuteronomy 24:7).
  • Old Testament bond-service and indentured servanthood was only temporary (Exodus 21:2).
  • Jews sometimes sold themselves into slavery to raise their standard of living (Leviticus 25:39).
  • Slaves were sometimes just like family and a slave could volunteer to remain a slave if he loved his master (Deuteronomy 15:16-17).

In Some Ways Slavery In Paul’s Day Was Like American Slavery.

In Greek writings, slaves were viewed as property or inanimate tools and not complete humans. Slaves were considered stupid and incapable of providing for themselves and therefore slavery was thought to be a benefit (Harold W. Hoehner. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, page 801).

The treatment of slaves depended on the character of the owner and some owners grossly mistreated their slaves. For example, Emperor “Caligula had the hands of a slave cut off for stealing a piece of silver. He hung them around his neck and paraded him around the dining hall with a placard that stated the reason for the punishment” (Hoehner, 803).

In Many Ways Slavery In Paul’s Day Was Different From American Slavery.

In 1st Century Roman Empire there was little difference, in some areas, between slaves and freemen in race, speech or occupations. Homer Kent writes that slaves were clerks, accountants, doctors, nurses, teachers, advisors, musicians, and artists. There was no climate of unrest among slaves in the first century and the institution of slavery was rarely debated. So when Paul admonishes slaves to obey their masters it is much like saying today that Christians should be the best employees in their company.

1. Slavery in Paul’s day was not based on race or skin color. Slaves were from different nationalities and in some cases slaves owned slaves. Whereas in America, slavery was a white/black issue. This prejudice led to the Civil Rights Movement.

2. Free persons could sell themselves into slavery for a contracted time period and when the agreement was over, the slave would be free. Therefore slavery was not life-long. This was not the case with the slavery in America. People in the first century would sell themselves into slavery to raise their standard of living. For example, Epictetus, a first century Stolic philosopher who was born in slavery, reports that when he was a slave he was provided with food, clothes, and shelter, and taken care of when sick. These benefits were not provided when he became a freeperson” (Hoehner,  802).

3. Slaves could be educated in the 1st century as tutors which is referred to in Galatians 3:24. Slaves tutored the sons of their masters in morals and manners. Slaves were also professors in higher education, physicans, and philosophers as in the case of Epictetus.

Scripture Does Not Directly Advocate The Abolition Of The Institution Of Slavery.

Scripture does condemn slave owners  in 1 Timothy 1:10 but not the institution of slavery.

1. People became slaves in the 1st century because of infanticide. Children were abandoned and some were rescued by becoming slaves. To abolish the institution of slavery would mean leaving these children abandoned.

2. People became slaves because of debt. Since people in debt could not file “chapter 11″ they would sell themselves into slavery to pay off their debt. To abolish the institution of slavery would leave the creditors unpaid.

3. Paul taught obedience to government in Romans 13 and to propose the abolition of the institution of slavery would defy government.

Scripture Does In Principle Condemn The Institution Of Slavery.

1. The Bible teaches us to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:39). You cannot love your neighbor and own him/her as a piece of property because he is only 60% the human you are.

2. The Bible teaches that we are to treat others the way we would want them to treat us (Matthew 7:12). We would not want to be kidnapped from our homes, families, country, and shipped to another nation to be abused for the rest of our lives.

3. The Bible condemns self-righteousness which is the essence of racism and the slavery of black people. Jesus condemned self-righteousness in Matthew 5:20. An example of self-righteousness is in Luke 18:9-14 where the Pharisee prayed, “I thank you, that I am not as other men are.” The self-righteous racist prays, “I thank you, that I do not have the color of skin as other men.”

4. Paul taught that slaves and masters are equal brothers in Christ (Galatians 3:28 and 1 Timothy 6:2).

5.  Paul instructed slaves to obtain their freedom if possible (1 Corinthians 7: 21), that slaves are free persons in Christ (1 Corinthians 7:22), and for free persons to avoid slavery (1 Corinthians 7:23).

6. Christianity emphasized the transformation of the individual who could change his culture rather than the reformation of society. Paul instructs both slaves and slave owners to be servants of Christ, who was master of both, in treating each other properly in Ephesians 6: 5-9.

In Part 2, I will show modern day examples of slavery and explore Ephesians 6:5-9 in detail.

There are skeptics today who deny the physical resurrection of Christ from the grave. Tim Keller, in his book The Reason For God, examines this skepticism in chapter 13, The Reality of the Resurrection. Luke, in contrast to the skeptics, says in Acts 1:3 that there are “many infallible proofs” of the literal resurrection of Christ from the dead. One of the irrefutable proofs is the empty tomb; but not the empty tomb by itself. The empty tomb along with the many post-resurrection sightings of Christ in His resurrection body.

The Empty Tomb

The critics argue that the corpse of Christ could have been stolen to produce an empty tomb. This argument is refutable. Did the friends of Christ steal His body? Is it reasonable to believe that these followers of Christ who were men and women of integrity would lie about Christ being raised from the dead and then die for a hoax? People do not die for a fraud.

If the friends of Christ did not remove the body of Christ then His enemies must have, say the skeptics. If this were the case why did they not simply display the rotting corpse of Christ when the disciples were preaching that Christ was resurrected and end the nonsense? But they not bring forth Christ’s dead body as exhibit “A”.

What makes the empty tomb irrefutable proof for Jesus’ resurrection are the at least ten sightings of Christ during the forty days following His resurrection. Christ appeared to different individuals and groups in various locations for one month.

The Total Transformation of Jesus’ Disciples

In addition to the post-resurrecton appearances was the total transformation of the individuals to whom Christ revealed Himself. After Jesus was crucified by the Jews and the Romans, His followers feared for their lives and cowered behind bolted doors. But when Jesus appeared to them in His resurrection body, they rushed into the market place witnessing to His resurrection and many of them to their death. They did not die for a fraud but for their risen Savior.

One of the followers that I would like to focus on was James, the younger half-bother of Jesus. Jesus was of course Mary’s firstborn and virgin born Son. Mary was Jesus’ mother but Joseph was not His father. God was Jesus’ Father. After the birth of Jesus, however, Joseph and Mary consummated their marriage and had other children. The next born was James. We believe this because in the texts that list the brothers of Jesus, James is always first.

I have often thought, perhaps, it was frustrating to grow up as the younger half-brother of Jesus. Any time James misbehaved, I imagine Mary saying, “James why can’t you be like your brother Jesus?” Well, it is obvious why James could not behave like Jesus. Jesus was and is the perfect, sinless Son of God.

Or maybe Jesus would tell James to do something. For example, they were working in Joseph’s carpenter shop and Jesus tells James, “James we need some more lumber.” James could have responded, like my three younger brothers sometimes responded to me at home, “I ain’t your slave!” It could have been difficult living with Jesus as your older half-brother.

These two brothers eventually grew up and James listen to Jesus preach, saw Him opened blinded eyes, and also heard Jesus claim to be the Old Testament predicted Messiah, Son of God, and Savior of the world. There is a remarkable statement in John 7:5 about the home life of James and Jesus: “For neither did his brothers believe in him.” The siblings who grew up in the same home with Jesus did not except Him as their Savior while He was in their home.

But then came that dark day when James saw his older half-brother crucified. James saw the Romans drive nails through the hands and feet of Jesus. James also observed the Roman soldier, whose duty was to ensure the death of the crucified criminal, drive the spear not only through the side of Jesus but into His heart. James painfully watched the soldiers take the dead, limp, and blood soaked body of Jesus off the cross and place him in the tomb.

On the third day, however, Jesus arose from the dead and started appearing to people. Paul records in 1st Corinthians 15 that Jesus in His resurrected body appeared to Peter, the twelve apostles, and five hundred brethren at one time. Then very significantly, Paul records that Jesus appeared to James, His younger half-brother. It seems almost as if Jesus determined to reveal Himself to His younger brother. Then James could pass on the news to the rest of the family. What a revelation that must have been for James when he saw Jesus with the nail prints in His hands and feet. Surely, James exclaimed, “You really are the Messiah, Son of God, and Savior of the world.” It is believed this is time when James trusted his older half-bother as his Savior.

James not only trusted Christ as his Savior but he surrendered as His servant. James was eventually called to preach and pastor the most prominent church in the first century, the church of Jerusalem. He also wrote the Epistle that bears his name.

Remember how we imagined the way James must have responded to Jesus telling him to do something when they were younger and at home, “I ain’t your slave!” Listen now to how James opens his Epistle in James 1:1, “James, a bondman or slave of God and the Lord Jesus Christ.” Now when James’ older half-brother would tell him to do something, James’ reply was: “I am your slave!” “I am your slave and witness of your resurrection to my death if necessary!” And so he was. Josephus, the first century Jewish historian, reports that the enemies of James’ older half-brother threw James from the top of the temple and then beat him to death.

What transformed James from a sibling who refused to believe in Jesus as his Savior when they lived together at home to a follower who died for him? The resurrection of Jesus. James met his older half-brother in His resurrection body.

Have you trusted the resurrected Christ and surrendered to be His slave? You can right now. Paul informs each sinner how to be saved in Romans 10:9, “If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.” Respond to the irrefutable evidence and bow before the Resurrected Christ.

Mark Driscoll said in his sermon on Slaves and Masters, “Slavery is a shameful page in the history of our nation and history of the American church. Many of the framers of our Constitution claimed to be Christians who considered white men to be created by God with inherent rights deserving representation. But, many were also slave owners who claimed black men deserved only 3/5 representation (as if they were less image bearers of God), an atrocity not corrected until the passage of the 13th Amendment.”

Tim Keller agrees when he writes “a deep stain on Christian history is the African slave trade. Since Christianity was dominant in the nations that bought and sold slaves during that time, the churches must bear responsibility along with their societies for what happened.” This is one of the many arguments that skeptics raise against Christianity that Keller addresses in “The Reason for God.”

It is a tragic fact that not only did our nation split over slavery but major denominations in America split over New World Slavery: The Presbyterians split in 1838 and the Methodists in 1844. The Southern Baptist Convention was established in 1845 in Augusta, Georgia in order to maintain human slavery. This is regrettable. The southern cotton plantations needed cheap labor whereas the more industrialized north did not.

Scriptures on slavery in the Bible were used to justify slavery in America. There is a problem using verses on slavery in the Bible to justify slavery in America because the two are not equal. “Slavery was taken for granted in all of ancient society” (Homer Kent. Treasures of Wisdom. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1978, 156).

  • Slavery in the Old Testament was protected against abuse (Exodus 21:2).
  • Slaves maimed by their masters were set free (Exodus 21:26-27).
  • The murder of slaves was a capital offense (Exodus 21:12).
  • Kidnapping (a major source for the African slave trade) was forbidden (Deuteronomy 24:7).
  • Old Testament bond-service and indentured servanthood was only temporary (Exodus 21:2).
  • Jews sometimes sold themselves into slavery to raise their standard of living (Leviticus 25:39).
  • Slaves were sometimes just like family and a slave could volunteer to remain a slave if he loved his master (Deuteronomy 15:16-17).

In some ways slavery in Paul’s day was like American slavery.

In Greek writings, slaves were viewed as properity or inanimate tools and not complete humans. Slaves were considered stupid and incapable of providing for themselves and therefore slavery was thought to be a benefit (Harold W. Hoehner. Ephesians. page 801).

The treatment of slaves depended on the character of the owner and some owners mistreated their slaves. For example Emperior “Caligula had the hands of a slave cut off for stealing a piece of silver. He hung them around his neck and paraded him around the dinnig hall with a placard that stated the reason for the punishment” (Hoehner, 803).

In many ways slavery in Paul’s day was different from American slavery.

In 1st Century Roman Empire there was little difference, in some areas, between slaves and freemen in race, speech or occupations. Homer Kent writes that slaves were clerks, accountants, doctors, nurses, teachers, advisors, musicians, and artists. There was no climate of unrest among slaves in the first century and the institution of slavery was rarely debated. So when Paul admonishes slaves to obey their masters it is much like saying today that Christians should be the best employees in their company.

1. Slavery in Paul’s day was not based on race or skin color. Slaves were from different nationalities and in some cases slaves owned slaves. Whereas in America, slavery was a white/black issue.

2. Free persons could sell themselves into slavery for a contracted time period and when the agreement was over, the slave would be free. Therefore slavery was not lifelong. This was not the case with the slavery in America. People in the first century would sell themselves into slavery to raise their standerd of living. For example, Epictetus reports that when he was a slave he was provided with food, clothes, and shetter, and taken care of when sick. These benefits were not provided when he became a freeperson” (Hoehner,  802).

3. Slave could be educated in the 1st century as tutors which is referred to in Galatians 3:24. Slaves tutored the sons of their masters in morals and manners. Slaves were also professors in higher education, physicans, and philosophers as in the case of Epictetus.

Scripture does not directly advocate the abolition of the institution of slavery.

Scripture does condemn slave owners  in 1 Timothy 1:10 but not the institution of slavery.

1. People became slaves in the 1st century because of infanticide. Children were abandoned and some were rescued by becoming slaves. To abolish the institution of slavery would mean leaving these children abandoned.

2. People became slaves because of debt. Since people in debt could not file “chapter 11″ they would sell themselves into slavery to pay off there debt. To abolish the institution of slavery would leave the creditors unpaid.

3. Paul taught obedience to government in Romans 13 and to propose the abolition of the institution of slavery would defy government.

Scripture does in principle condemn the institution of slavery.

1. The Bible teaches us to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:39). You can not love your neighbor and own him/her as a piece of property because he is only 60% the human you are.

2. The Bible teaches that we are to treat others the way we would want them to treat us (Matthew 7:12). We would not want to be kidnapped from our homes, families, country, and shipped to another nation to be abused for the rest of our lives.

3. The Bible condemns self-righteosness which is the essence of racialism and the slavery of black people. Jesus condemned self-righteousness in Matthew 5:20. An example of self-righteousness is in Luke 18:9-14 where the Pharisee prayed, “I thank you, that I am not as other men are.” The self-righteous racialist prays, “I thank you, that I do not have the color of skin as other men.”

4. Paul taught that  slaves and masters are equal brothers in Christ (Galatians 3:28 and 1 Timothy 6:2).

5.  Paul instructed slaves to obtain their freedom if possible (1 Corinthians 7: 21), that slaves are free persons in Christ (1 Corinthinas 7:22), and for free persons to avoid slavery (1 Corinthians 7:23).

6. Christianity emphasized the transformation of the individual who could change his culture rather than the reformation of society. Paul instructs both slaves and slave owners to be servants of Christ, who was master of both, in treating each other properly in Ephesians 6: 5-9.

Keller in chapter four, “The Church is Responsible for So Much Injustice,” responds to skeptics who throw up slavery in the Bible as evidence of injustice by saying, “Even though slavery in some form was virtually universal in every human culture over the centuries, it was Christians who first came to the conclusion that it was wrong.” Christian abolitionist, such as William Wilberforce, helped abolish slavery in the British Empire.

Albert Mohler reports what is unknown to many is that slavery is still a world-wide problem. Free The Slaves reports there are 27 million slaves today who are forced to work without pay. In Haiti, there are 300,000 slaves.

Journalist, Dan Harris wrote for ABC news on July 8, 2008, “How to Buy a Child in 10 Hours.” That is how long it took Harris to drive 45 minutes to Kennedy Airport, fly 3 1/2 hours to Port-au-Prince, Haiti and complete a transaction. Harris continues, “by the time my team and I have collected our luggage, gone through immigration and customs, and are loaded into our vehicles, it’s about 3:15 p.m….By 4:45 p.m., I’m poolside at one of the city’s few upscale hotels. I’m wearing a hidden camera built into the strap of a bike messenger-style bag that’s around my neck. There’s another hidden camera in a leather satchel on the table, right next to the fruit plate and Evian water. My colleagues are manning cameras in hotel rooms overlooking the pool. Our security guards are sitting discretely nearby. That’s when the man with whom I’ve arranged a meeting shows up. He says he’s a former member of parliament and that he has connections. In broad daylight, with hotel waiters walking by, he doesn’t even flinch when I make a horrific request. ‘If I would like to get a child to live with me and take care of me,’ I ask. ‘Could you do that?’

‘Yes,’ he says, ‘I can.’

The trafficker assures me he’s done this sort of transaction many times before.

‘A girl or a boy?’ he asks.

‘A girl probably,’ I say.

‘How old?’

‘Mayby 10 or 11.’

In the 21st Century, it is possible to buy a child for sex or cheap labor in just 10 hours. Does the church have a responsibility to address issues such as child slavery? If so, how should the church respond?

Keller entitled chapter one “There Can’t Be Just One True Religion.”

If you have ever been stumped in witnessing to a skeptic, then this chapter will load your gun with armor piercing bullets.

Keller addresses the first of seven objections, defearter beliefs, which skeptics fire at Christianity. Remember from last week’s review how Keller defined “defeater belief” from his website:  “a set of ‘common-sense’ consensus beliefs that automatically make Christianity seem implausible to people. These are what philosophers call ‘defeater beliefs.’  A defeater belief is Belief-A that, if true, means Belief-B can’t be true.”

Exclusivity is the first defeater belief. This objection has been thrown at me when discussing religion with unbelievers. The objectors usually say, with rising blood pressure, something like: “You are arrogant and intolerant to think you are right and all other religions are wrong,” or “Your superior thinking about your religious views is dangerous and detrimental to world peace.”

Keller discusses “three approaches civil and cultural leaders around the world are using to address the divisiveness of religion.”

The first approach is to outlaw religion.

This has been futilely attempted by countries like Communist China, who “expelled Western missionaries after World War II,” only to see the number of Christians explode.

The second approach to the divisiveness of exclusivity is to condemn religion.

This strategy is more efficient than the first and goes like this: Create an environment that makes religions which claim exclusivity look unenlightened and outrageous. This brainwashing is accomplished by drilling certain axioms into the public’s thinking which gain the status of common sense. Keller analyzes four of these axioms. Perhaps you have been baffled by them in previous skirmishes with skeptics.

“All major religions are equally valid and basically teach the same thing.”  

“Each religion sees part of spiritual truth, but none can see the whole truth.”

“Religious belief is too culturally and historically conditioned to be ‘truth.’”

“It is arrogant to insist your religion is right and to convert others to it.”

The proponents of these views are holding to an exclusive view of religion. They have their own alternate view and articles of faith. They arrogantly condemn other religions (Exclusivism) which do not hold to their view. They are guilty of the very charge leveled against exclusivists plus hypocrisy.

The third approach is to keep religion completely private.

This view states that a person can privately practice his religion and even evangelize but must keep religious beliefs out of the public. The reason given for this view is that religious views interjected into any moral debate are “conversation stoppers.” Keller argues any opposing view interjected into the argument over moral issues stops the conversation.  The political debate over abortion polarizes even when argued strictly from secular views concerning choice. Again, as in the other views, the opponents of Christianity’s exclusivity are guilty of that which they are accusing us. To point out this hypocrisy is a strategy to disarming skeptics.

What think ye?

Have you ever struggled with doubt? I mean doubt in God. His goodness, fairness, or love because of the pain you were suffering or the disappointment you were experiencing. James Dobson talks about the awesome “Why?” The first time in your life you seriously questioned God. I was a high school senior taking biology with my educated teacher who taught atheistic evolution, when I felt the sting of the first “Why?” In contrast, my pastor, though godly, was illiterate and a creationist. The biology teacher successfully planted doubts in my mind to the truths I had loosely held most of my life. I will never forget the strange, new feeling of cynicism. I doubted the divine person I, at least, had held in high esteem. The darkness in my soul was like a lost confidence in a mentor because of some scandal or betrayal by a best friend.

In the coming weeks I will review, chapter by chapter, Tim Keller’s book on apologetics subtitled, Belief in an Age of Skepticism. Keller introduces his book with this quote from Darth Vader setting the tone: “I find your lack of faith—disturbing.” In the introduction, Keller shares his own battle with tough questions about Christianity: “What about other religions? What about evil and suffering? How could a loving God judge and punish? Why believe anything at all?” As he studied these issues, Christianity won out.

Keller documents: “the population in America is paradoxically growing both more religious and less religious at once.” He quotes a George Barna report confirming “One in Three Adults Is Unchurched.”  The anti-religion books by Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens are increasing in sales.  At same time, members are leaving, dead old-line denominations and going to orthodox churches that demand conversion to Christ. For example, Keller launched his church in New York City, Redeemer Presbyterian Church, in the late 1980s and by 2007 his weekly attendance was over 5,ooo.

Each of the growing groups, skeptics and conservative believers, should look at their doubts. Each group has its doubts and belief systems and needs to deal with the hard questions the other side is proposing. Believers should be able to answer the skeptic’s arguments against Christianity lest they fall prey. I was unequipped to answer the atheistic evolutionary tenets of my biology teacher and I was rocked.

The skeptic should go and do likewise. The cynic who says “There can’t be just one true religion” cannot prove that truth claim empirically and therefore has faith in an indefeasible belief. Keller says to the skeptic that it would “be inconsistent to require more justification for Christian belief than you do for your own.”

Keller declares his thesis: “If you come to recognize the beliefs on which your doubts about Christianity are based, and if you seek as much proof for those beliefs as you seek from Christians for theirs—you will discover that your doubts are not as solid as they first appear.”

In the first half of The Reason for God, Keller confronts seven objections skeptics level against Christianity and the alternative beliefs those objections rest on. On Keller’s website, “The Movement”, which you can access from my blogroll, he has a post entitled Deconstructing Defeater Beliefs: Leading the Secular to Christ. In this post Keller calls the seven objections Defeater beliefs which he describes as “a set of ‘common-sense’ consensus beliefs that automatically make Christianity seem implausible to people. These are what philosophers call ‘defeater beliefs’.  A defeater belief is Belief-A that, if true, means Belief-B can’t be true.” Next week we will review chapter one and the Defeater belief: “There Can’t Be Just One True Religion.”

In the second half of the book, he examines the reasons underlying Christian beliefs. Keller ends his introduction with the example of Thomas. When Jesus confronted “doubting Thomas” he challenged him “to acquiesce in doubt (‘believe’) and yet responded to his request for more evidence.” Jesus gave the skeptic the evidence of His deity in his hands and side. This is Keller’s approach, to give more evidence to the skeptic to win them. Publishers Weekly agrees when it writes that Keller’s book was “written for skeptics and the believers who love them.”

Sometimes I like to read several books at the same time, instead of sitting down and reading right through one book. If that is your modus operandi, then join me in reading through The Reason for God and add your weekly comments.

Comments, anyone?